Why Free Speech and Free Internet Advocates Must Love Hitler

Daily Stormer 
April 20, 2017

On this most special of days I find it fitting to do outreach to liberals and libertarians alike, who hold the lofty and noble ideal of freedom alight above themselves. I would like to the reader to suspend any reaction of emotion you might have to carefully consider my words in the context of my position and history.

Very few so-called defenders of free speech have ever made any sort of sacrifice for that cause. Unlike the great hypocrites of the world, I have put my own body as a sacrifice on the altar of liberty.


“The Internet’s best terrible person.” A “disappointment.” “Reviled/Beloved.” Those are just a few of the things people have called convicted AT&T/iPad “hacker” Andrew Auernheimer — a.k.a. “Weev” — currently sitting in federal prison serving a 41-month sentence.

Whether you love him or hate him, whether you disagree with him or disagree with AT&T, even if you’re indifferent — you should hope Weev wins his appeal filed last night before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

The future of the Internet may well depend on it.

Of course, I was a “terrible,” “reviled,” “disappointment” in this context because I was an alleged racist and a misogynist – as if there is something other than virtue in wanting to protect white women from the primary threats to their continued existence: brown people and themselves. Unlike my detractors, I have sacrificed millions of dollars and literal years of my life to the cause of man’s liberty. I am held in contempt for this because I have recognized what is the real source of freedom. I write this because I wish you to know what the source of freedom is as well.

Freedom is explicitly a product of white European civilization.

Of all the countries of the world, how many populated by nonwhites might you suppose have constitutional guarantees of free speech? The answer is only two: Japan and Hong Kong. The only reason they have these guarantees is because they were forced to at gunpoint by white aggression. Hong Kong as a British protectorate had the highest degree of press freedom in all of Asia, and it inherited the spirit of British law into Article 27 of the Hong Kong Basic Law, which serves as the region’s constitution. Similarly, free speech was guaranteed in postwar Japan only by America’s insistence.

Since the creation of these standards, however, they have been whittled down by gooks into mere shells of what they used to be. Japan now assures press freedom to a limited oligopoly of press clubs. It has shown unparalleled levels of freedom amongst developed nation only for the possession of child pornography, which it only managed to outlaw in 2014 after several decades of foreign pressure. Similarly, many exceptions to Hong Kong’s Basic Law have been instituted in the years since it became a special administrative region of China in 1997.

In all of history, only two nonwhite nations ever valued freedom of speech and they did so only because a white man pointed a gun at them. That’s an important data point.

Nonwhites that grow up in white countries despise free speech.

The cuckold will respond by saying that it is about culture, not race, and that nonwhite immigrants will have children which are amenable to our ideas after absorbing them through osmosis. To these people I’d like to show an interesting correlation:

The Emancipators, from Lincoln to Obama:

“It is of noticable importance that 39% of Millennials identify [themselves] as non-white, making them the most diverse generation in American history.”

Add just 1% for Jews and you find that Millennials are 40% nonwhite. Of this same generation, the exact same number advocates restricting speech “offensive to minorities”.

Pew Research:

We asked whether people believe that citizens should be able to make public statements that are offensive to minority groups, or whether the government should be able to prevent people from saying these things. Four-in-ten Millennials say the government should be able to prevent people publicly making statements that are offensive to minority groups, while 58% said such speech is OK.

Let me summarize the facts here. 40% of Millennials are not white. 40% of Millennials oppose speech offensive to minorities. This is not a coincidence. The reality is that the children of immigrants are more hostile to liberty than their parents. This may seem paradoxical to adherents of the proposition nation idea. If you have faith that America’s Constitution creates a zone of magic soil that will make people fundamentally different from birth you might have a hard time understanding this. However, this phenomenon will make perfect sense to students of human biodiversity (HBD). It’s usually noted that children of higher IQ parents from a lower IQ race will themselves have lower IQ despite the intellect of their parents.

Regression to the mean is a fancy way of saying that things even out over time. If you take one measurement and it is high, the next generation of measurements is going to be closer to the average. IQ is not the only feature primarily influenced by genetics, and thus not the only feature of a race of people that regresses towards the mean. There are genes that influence whether or not you believe in god, genes that influence all kinds of aggression (including, of course, murder and rape) and even in nearly every species of animal that ever existed darker pigments mean a higher likelihood of sexual aggression and violence.

There are genes that affect all facets of behavior, culture, and crime. Linking to the thousands of empirical proofs of this is beyond the scope of this article, but you should acquaint yourself to the concept of Weltanschauung, specifically in the context of German idealism and romanticism. This Germanic word essentially boils down to “racial worldview” – an acknowledgment that differing groups have differing ideas that are inherent to their characters. The truth of this concept is self-evident even when one drives through neighborhoods of foreigners.

Nonwhites that are exceptional are not exceptional because of anything inherent to their nature. They are only exceptional because of a brief and fleeting life circumstance. Typically, successful first generation immigrants sold their countrymen down the river and wanted to escape to America to live in a place where they would not be held to account and lose their ill-gotten gains. This gave them financial incentives to live more in accordance with our culture and customs. Their anchor babies, however, have no such incentive. In every facet from intellect, income, propensity for crime, and cultural inclinations they will be far closer to their racial counterparts from their homeland. As a result, non-white Millennials are more hostile to free speech than that of previous non-white generations.

Everything from objective truth to the very existence of whites is offensive to minorities.

The video above, simply showing a handful of newspaper clippings without commentary, is banned in dozens of countries. How could this possibly be offensive to anyone? I invite the reader to consider why such material might be so objectionable to the establishment. I ask you also to consider our mantra, considered hate speech and potentially terroristic in nearly every country in the world. Fourteen simple words: we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. The UK’s largest paper declares them “Fourteen Words that spell racism” and the ADL defines it as “the most popular white supremacist slogan in the world.” Why is the mere continued existence of whites and their children deemed objectionable by anyone, anywhere?

The reality is that they hate us for our freedoms. There is a vast, global effort to flood only white countries with huge numbers of hostile immigrants who oppose the values inherent to our very existence. These immigrants outbreed us with the welfare money we give them and transform our countries into places inhospitable for us. This is all done in the name of “diversity”, even though there are less white people than any other race and we hold less territory.

27 years ago in Austria a man was born that attempted to prevent this from happening. His words on the subject remain timeless, and upon examination one cannot dispute that the exact same thing is happening today:

Jews were responsible for bringing Negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate.

There is only one potential solution to white genocide: nonwhites in white countries must be reduced to chains, firstly so that their numbers may be culled as to no longer threaten the white race with extinction, and secondly so those that remain can be made to work off the debt they owe to the white race for the violence and harm they have done us. Hitler did nothing wrong (morally, of course, in hindsight many might dispute tactical decisions made on the fronts of war) in his quest to prevent the destruction of his people by mongrelization and financial ruin.

It is thus that I celebrate today as the Tide of Adolf Hitler, the holiest of days of remembrance. This mightiest of men was a manifestation of the same divine presence that caused Henry Purcell to produce his arias, Rembrandt to put The Storm on the Sea of Galilee to canvas, Mendeleev to deduce the periodic properties of the elements, Maxwell to formulate his equations, and Newton to discover calculus. I recognize as Carl Gustav Jung did that he was an avatar of Wotan, the god I chose as my patron, to bring the wrath of his people against those that would have destroyed them. I recognize as Savitri Devi did that he was the twelfth incarnation of Vishnu, known as Kalki, to strike the earth like lightning and light fires upon the plains. I recognize that he was a Bodhisattva, forgoing his own happiness to show compassion to the suffering people of his homeland.

I have lived and suffered for the expansion of man’s liberty only because I am inspired by him. I have been kidnapped, I have been tortured, I have lost my home, I have been subject to all manners of indignity and pain and the reason I am able to keep going whilst every day seems a burden is that I know this perfect and divine being of goodness and light was made to suffer far worse at the hands of perfidious Jews. It is by his example that I know that the tide against our people can be turned, and that those that would destroy us can be resisted within our lives.

I love free speech. I love the Internet. I love these things not only because they are good but because they are the creation of white men, and only by the perpetuation of the existence of white men may they be maintained. I love these things, ergo I love Adolf Hitler.

Find this love in your heart, and you will find true compassion and heroism.