WHO Warns Lifting Lockdown is Dangerous, Urges Governments to Put in Place Mass Surveillance

They cannot keep you safe if they don’t know where you are and what you’re doing.

Facts, data, and reality itself say one thing, and the WHO and government “experts” say the opposite.

This isn’t the first time that the WHO has urged governments not to lift the lockdowns, but the lockdown strategy is much more widely debunked this time.

There is absolutely ZERO evidence that forcing people into a weird house arrest lifestyle where working and meeting family and friends is forbidden has any kind of positive effect on stopping the spread — and considering that infections have decreased after lifting the lockdown in most places, we should consider the possibility that the lockdown actually facilitated the spread.

If you wanted to make a harmless virus appear dangerous, you’d probably want to force people into a situation where the virus can thrive and make the most out of what you have. “Everyone must stay inside breathing recycled air and only go out to crowded supermarkets” sounds suspiciously like something that would work quite well for that goal.

Daily Mail:

The World Health Organization has warned there could be a ‘second peak’ of infections in America and Europe where coronavirus is declining if lockdown restrictions are relaxed too soon.

Dr Mike Ryan, the head of emergencies at the WHO, issued the grave warning in an online briefing Monday saying that while cases are declining in many countries, these nations could still face an ‘immediate second peak’ if they let up too soon on measures to halt the outbreak.

Ryan also warned that several countries in Central and South America, South Asia and Africa are continuing to record spikes in cases.

This came the same day that the WHO announced it is suspending its trial of hydoxychloroquine in coronavirus patients amid safety concerns over the anti-malaria drug.

Now they’re having safety concerns about the anti-malaria drug? While they warn that allowing people to have freedom is dangerous?

It sounds like they want to eliminate things that could be seen as alternatives to the eternal lockdown and mass vaccination agenda that they propose.

The world is still in the middle of the first wave of the coronavirus outbreak, Ryan said Monday.

He explained that epidemics often come in waves, which means outbreaks could come back later this year in places where the first wave has subsided.

There is also a risk that infection rates could rise again more quickly if measures to halt the first wave were lifted too soon, he warned.

‘When we speak about a second wave classically what we often mean is there will be a first wave of the disease by itself, and then it recurs months later. And that may be a reality for many countries in a number of months’ time,’ Ryan said.

‘But we need also to be cognizant of the fact that the disease can jump up at any time. We cannot make assumptions that just because the disease is on the way down now it is going to keep going down and we are get a number of months to get ready for a second wave. We may get a second peak in this wave.’

He said countries in Europe and North America should ‘continue to put in place the public health and social measures, the surveillance measures, the testing measures and a comprehensive strategy to ensure that we continue on a downwards trajectory and we don’t have an immediate second peak.’

What they’re saying, in essence, is that because the virus will come in waves, people must live under a permanent lockdown — at least until they’re vaccinated, in which case they’ll be allowed to go out until a new virus comes and everyone has to wait for a vaccine all over again.

This isn’t about keeping people safe. The lockdown is preventing people from building natural immunity to viruses — not just coronavirus.

They have a plan, and the plan depends on keeping the Doom Virus facade up in order to force all of the totalitarian police state mass surveillance measures that they want.