December 19, 2019
People 100 years ago thought we’d be building cities on Mars right about now…
This isn’t satire.
If I could write satire that’s half as hilarious as Britain’s current reality, I’d ask Anglin for a raise, and he’d give me one.
Branding someone a ‘nerd’ or ‘smarty-pants’ should be made a hate crime, an academic has claimed.
Psychology lecturer and psychotherapist Dr Sonja Falck says ‘divisive and humiliating’ anti-IQ insults can have negative effects that last a lifetime.
She wants people with the highest IQs in the country, who make up two per cent of the population, to be protected by the same hate crime laws as ethnic, religious and sexual minority groups.
The University of East London lecturer and Harley Street psychotherapist is also calling for the insults ‘braniac’, ‘know-it-all’, smart-a***’, ‘dweeb’ and ‘brain box’ to be covered by hate crime legislation.
Her views are based on eight years of research, which was spent speaking to dozens of high-ability children, parents, and adults about their own experiences.
She clams victims of anti-IQ slurs often experience the same level of distress and isolation as other minority groups at the receiving end of verbal abuse.
Extending legislation to include these words would, she claims, help stamp out the ‘archaic’ victimisation of more than one million Britons with a ‘gifted’ IQ score of 132 or over, she added.
She talked to a few dozen people about essentially nothing, and it took her 8 years to do it.
Can someone give me one single reason why women shouldn’t be completely banned from academia in general?
Literally, just one?
Dr Falck has just launched a new book called ‘Extreme Intelligence’, a study of discrimination against those with especially high IQs.
Speaking at her book launch, she said the next Government must take legislative action to encourage societal change.
Dr Falck is herself a member of high-IQ society Mensa, and has given presentations for the organisation as well as the US-based institution SENG (Supporting the Emotional Needs of the Gifted).
A high cognitive capacity doesn’t mean anything if all you do with it is engage in some goofy pseudoscience and write nonsensical books about non-issues.
As things stand, you’re just a societal parasite, no different than some 70ish IQ slobbering retard.
Actually, you’re a far more costly parasite than the retard is, since you actively try to damage society.
She said: ‘The N-word was common parlance in the UK until at least the 1960s.
‘Other insulting slurs about age, disability, religion and gender identity remained in widespread use until relatively recently.
‘Society at the time turned a blind eye to their impact by passing them off as harmless banter.
‘It is only with the benefit of hindsight and academic research that we realise how wrong we were.
‘The same can be said about anti-IQ words like ‘nerd‘, ‘brainbox‘, ‘geek‘, ‘egg-head‘, ‘dweeb‘ and ‘smarty-pants‘,’ she added.
‘Slurs such as these will continue to be used unabated at the expense of the brightest members of society unless and until legislative action is taken..’
Actually no, there was no “academic research” involved, it was just kike legislation destroying your life if you hurt the feels of whichever group of invaders and defectives they were using as battering rams against civilization.
There’s no such thing as genuine academic research left in fields like this when certain arguments get you fired and thrown in prison.
Oh wow, more women who want to put you in prison for hurtfeels
And how the hell is “brainbox” an insult?
We all have one of those.
In England and Wales, any communication that is threatening or abusive and directed towards a person on account of their race, colour, disability, nationality, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity is classed as hate crime.
It is covered by a variety of statutes including the Public Order Act 1986.
This has been revised over the years to include language that is deemed to incite racial, religious and sexual orientated hatred. Penalties can include imprisonment, fines, or both.
But Dr Falck, who also runs a Harley Street psychotherapy practice, says the legislation must be widened to include anti-IQ slurs, which she describes as hate crime’s ‘last taboo’.
Those with extreme intelligence should receive the same respect, acceptance and legal protection as the LGBT community and other minority groups.
There is absolutely no reason whatsoever for giving women any kind of political power in society, or even letting them talk in public for that matter.
And Britain might be the single best evidence for that – a country that within 100 years of giving women the right to vote went from the biggest empire in the history of the world to an open-air Moslem rape camp run by Jews and pedophiles.
The pendulum has swung so far towards insanity, that when it swings back to normalcy women should be grateful if they don’t all have their tongues cut out at birth.
They’d deserve it.