December 6, 2014
Back in 2010, sickening feminist man-hater Helen Reece from the London School of Economics was demanding Home Secretary Theresa May relax laws so that pedophiles could adopt children.
The Telegraph told us that her twisted logic for this vile and evil suggestion was that once a pervert has served their sentence, it should be assumed that they are no longer a threat.
“There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.
“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt, by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”
Apparently protecting children from predatory pedophiles goes against the human rights of child rapists, who may want to work with children or adopt them. Preventing them from doing so, leaves the government open to being sued by the perverts.
How could anyone trust a government that entertains ideas such as this, with running a child abuse enquiry?
Not surprisingly, the Daily Mail informs us today that many of the victims of historic child sex abuse at the hands of establishment pedophiles have now given up on the government listening to them.
Twenty-three of the victims that were supposed to be taking part in the enquiry have now written to the same Home Secretary that ordered the pedophile adoption review back in 2010 to say that the enquiry is not fit for purpose and they will not be taking part.
This comes after the last two heads of the enquiry were sacked for being too closely connected to the pedophile politicians involved.