Very few people wanted the deadly vaccine.
A small group was excited about it, as they actually believed the hype surrounding the supposed coronavirus, but the masses simply took the vaxx because they were compelled to by the government.
Conveniently, both the companies that make the vaxx and the government that compels people to take it are totally immune from liability.
So if the vaxx takes away your ability to speak, the only thing you can do is complain about it on the internet. However, you will probably just get censored.
A 43-year-old woman claims she was left unable to speak after receiving the second dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.
Sofia Gomes, from Wisbech in Cambridgeshire, thinks she had ‘a severe allergic reaction’ that prevented her from talking a few hours after getting the jab on May 19.
Doctors at King’s Lynn Hospital in Norfolk, where she went after developing the strange reaction, were ‘baffled’ after performing scans on her throat and not finding anything wrong, she said.
She stayed at the hospital for a week and was seen by several specialist who could not explain her condition, but said it may have been caused by the vaccine, according to Ms Gomes.
What else would it have been caused by?
The go-to answer is “it just happened randomly.”
A big coincidence.
But a Edinburgh university professor said her loss of voice was likely a coincidence.
The UK drug regulator the MHRA said there was ‘no evidence’ Ms Gomes losing her voice was linked to the vaccine.
She was told her voice will return and is waiting for speech therapy through the NHS.
Ms Gomes, an artist from Portugal, does not have any underlying health problem and wrote that she felt ‘really frustrated, upset, and frightened for the future’.
The reaction has stopped her being able to speak to her fiancé and six children, who are aged between on and 19.
‘I am trying to stay positive for my family, but I am really worried, and this has affected me a huge amount.
‘I feel bad that I can’t help my baby develop her speech, and one of my sons is autistic so it has been difficult not being able to communicate with him properly, too.
‘I miss reading stories to my children and singing to them at night, and I miss being able to speak to my family in Portugal over the phone.
‘I find it really hard to express my feelings when all I can do is just write things down in a notepad.’
Her fiancé Victor Plowman said Ms Gomes has been frustrated and left in tears because she cannot speak.
‘She’s been writing stuff down on a piece of paper, and sometimes she’ll point or gesture at something to indicate what she wants.
‘But it’s been really hard for her, as she can’t properly communicate with the kids.’
Ms Gomes reacted to her first jab on March 1, experiencing a high fever and pain in her legs. On the evening of her second jab, she did not feel well and could only whisper to her partner.
He said she ‘started clutching at her tonsils and her throat’.
‘We thought she was having an allergic reaction – so I called her an ambulance and she went up to hospital.’
Ms Gomes said people ‘should still go ahead and have a vaccine’ but said they should be aware of possible side effects or risks beforehand.
That is what is so crazy is that all of these people who have these horrible reactions are telling others to take it – at least the women.
This woman is a divorcee and a remarried single mother, so really as dumb as they come. Just look at her dumb-looking face.
This sort of moron should be protected by people with better sense.
Of course, the state claims that it is protecting her – by forcing her to be injected with a deadly vaxx.
The state is now utterly paternalistic, deciding when people are allowed to go outside, who they are allowed to talk to, who they are allowed to celebrate holidays with, when they are allowed to remove the piece of cloth from their faces. But they use that paternalistic power to harm people.