May 28, 2019
If I had to make a list of the top 5 most gassable categories of non-Jews in the world, judges would be right there on the podium.
Asylum seeker age assessments based on physical appearance and outward behaviour are unlawful, UK judges have said.
Government guidelines allowing authorities to treat such migrants as adults if their physical appearance and/or demeanour “very strongly suggests that they are significantly over 18 years of age” are not legitimate and risk “children being unlawfully detained”, according to a new ruling.
Remind me again – why are you letting them in in the first place?
Ah right, because letting subhuman vermin invade your country, steal your money and rape your women is principles and values.
Lord Justice Underhill said: “In the absence of guidance as to the width of the margin of error there is inevitably a real risk that immigration officers will place too much trust in their own assessment that a particular young person is ‘significantly’ over 18.”
Because it’s obvious most of the time, you retard.
There aren’t that many “keeds” actually coming in in the first place; the vast majority of them are adults.
The case was brought to the Court of Appeal by representatives for an Eritrean male who broke into Britain on the back of a lorry in 2014 and presented himself to police as a 16-year-old who was born in 1998.
Lawyers argued the migrant, identified only as BF, was unlawfully detained after several members of the authorities including police officers and border guards refused to believe he was a minor, according to The Times, which reports that the Eritrean was described by a chief immigration officer involved in the assessment as looking like “an adult in his mid-twenties”.
Age assessments based on physical assessments and demeanour are not necessarily accurate, Lord Justices Underhill, Simon, and Baker said in their ruling, pointing out that BF was found to be over 18 at two formal assessments before another test six months later in Wales, where social workers in Wales deemed him to be a child.
At what age do you stop being a child in Britain?
Apparently, if you’re a nigger fleeing the brutal Syrian civil war in Eritrea, it’s somewhere around 60.
And how the hell was he unlawfully detained if he was arrested breaking the law?
Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) boss, Rebecca Hilsenrath, praised the ruling, declaring that “children’s rights and welfare should not be a guessing game”, while the Home Office professed it was “disappointed by the judgment”.
You will all be shocked to know that this Orwellian institution‘s chairman is named David Isaac, and that the only White male member is blind.
NGOs and so-called human rights bodies are generally opposed to age testing asylum seekers who claim to be children, with the Council of Europe demanding that such migrants “be given the benefit of the doubt and presumed to be a child” on the basis that age assessments “may be frightening and unsettling for children”.
Everybody who thinks (((human rights))) are a real thing or works for an (((NGO))) is also making the podium.
But others argue that the dismantling of checks risks putting unvetted, potentially dangerous adults into close proximity with children at services like schools and foster homes.
Fears that adult migrants are posing as children to gain access to favourable treatment and more costly services by the UK authorities have not been unfounded, according to previous Home Office figures, which revealed 65 per cent of individuals alleging they were “unaccompanied minors” in the year to September 2015 were judged to be over 18.
Yes, but saying that is pure hatred and meanthink, so your argument is not valid.
She saw the rapefugee wasn’t 12, but she still took him in, because most women are retarded.
Britain is already so far gone, you might as well just forget about it, m8.