UK: Church Attacks Mary’s Virginity; Denies Immaculate Conception!

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
December 28, 2018

This is a new low for the totally degenerate Church of England.

RT:

The popular Christmas carol ‘Hark! The Herald Angels Sing’ has been updated to remove a reference to Jesus’ mother’s virginity, and clergymen are warning parishioners not to be “squeamish” about Mary’s womb.

The line “offspring of a virgin’s womb” has now been replaced with “offspring of the favored one” in the carol that will be sung in churches all across the UK over the Christmas period. 

What in God’s name is going on here?

This is so Jewish, I can’t even.

Seriously.

Jews claim that Jesus was the bastard son of a Roman soldier, named Pantera. Like that band.

This is a standard Jewish method of slandering Christ by denying his immaculate conception.

Wikipedia:

Tiberius Pantera could have been serving in the region at the time of Jesus’s conception. Both the ancient Talmud and medieval Jewish writings and sayings reinforced this notion, referring “Yeshu ben Pantera”, which some scholars believe should be translated as “Jesus, son of Pantera”. The hypothesis is considered unlikely by mainstream scholars given that there is little other evidence to support the Pantera paternity outside of the Jewish texts. Historically, the name Pantera is not unusual and was in use among Roman soldiers.

See?

Every time.

It’s the Jews. 

Not everyone is a fan of the remix, however. Senior Church of England clergy are warning choirs against opting for the updated version in their services, saying the new text could mislead those less familiar with Christian faith.

The change “plays down the Virgin Birth, plays down the reality of Christ’s birth, and Mary’s femininity – that he came out of a womb; this was a real birth from a real woman,” said Revd Marcus Walker, rector of Great St Bartholomew in London, to The Telegraph.

That motion was seconded by the Bishop of Crediton, Jacqueline Searle, who said: “It’s important that we are not squeamish about singing ‘of a virgin’s womb’, which reflects nothing being impossible with God.”

Here’s another picture of her:

There should be physiognomy checks for any position of any consequence after the dust from the Reclamation Wars settles down. Also, the whole woman thing needs to be addressed. No woman in the world can ever give me any spiritual advice or honestly claim to be in communion with the Divine.

Nope, sorry. Women are far too materialistic and animalistic for literally anything spiritual.

And the reason that this one is so hell-bent on getting rid of the virgin clause is that she’s clearly a used up old slut and doesn’t want the little girls to have the role model of the chaste Virgin Mary, but to follow in her own slut footsteps instead.

Also, on a hypothetical note… I wouldn’t even be mad if Jesus was actually the son of a Roman soldier.

I mean, I know it’s supposed to be Jewish slander… but Rome was based AF and no one can deny that.

In my humble opinion, all White people are spiritual descendants of Rome or Constantinople anyways… so I don’t even, like, take the Jews’ attempt at slander as an insult.

Funny enough, if we were to believe this Talmudic tall-tale, it would absolutely kill another concurrent slander about Jesus that the Jews are pushing. Namely, that he looked like this:

It would, in fact, mean that Jesus was alpha AF and looked something like this:

Which idk about you, but I can definitely live with that.

But whatever, I don’t want to potentially offend any Christians with this sort of talk.

… although, I could. And, let’s be real –  they wouldn’t do anything about it. Because none of them actually seem to believe in Heaven and martyrdom anymore.

So, frankly, before you get mad at me, perhaps consider why everyone else seems fine taking shots at Christianity nowadays.

They should have nipped the whole thing in the bud about 60 years ago at least with a mass IRA-style terror campaign directed at Atheists and Jews.

Sure, a lot of people would have had to sacrifice their lives for the cause… but isn’t that the point of Christianity?

Seriously. You can’t have a religion that no one is willing to die for. 

In fact, if it isn’t already, I humbly propose that it should be the legalistic and academic benchmark for deciding if something is or isn’t a religion. Namely, is someone willing to martyr themselves for it or not? If yes, it’s legit. If no, then it’s a social club.

Modern Christianity just isn’t making the cut anymore, fellas.

And I say this as someone who loves everything about classic Christianity. The aesthetic, the music, the fancy-sounding Latin and Greek words – all of it absolutely top-tier.

But there’s just none of that left in the West anymore. 

And what’s worse, it seems that there are very few Christians trying to resist the degradation of their faith.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS