August 2, 2017
Allegedly, they’ve obtained a document that EXPLICITLY STATES they want to end DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WHITES…!
Once upon a time, Ivy League schools placed quotas on Jews to keep their institutions from becoming the self-satirizing clown show they are today and it was called bigotry and a violation of civil rights. At the same time, the Jews who slithered in and took control once the quota system was lifted are now calling it bigotry and a violation of civil rights to oppose doing the exact same thing to America’s dwindling white plurality.
Non-Jewish white people are already highly underrepresented in Ivy League institutions. Even East Asians have their numbers controlled under the quota system (it’s never been explained why they have “white privilege,” but that is the assumed argument). Since Asian parents only care about their kids getting into good schools, Trump could pry their bloc vote away from the Democrats just by intervening on behalf of them and whites here – that is, by removing the system of Affirmative Action and returning to an achievement-based meritocracy.
The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Department’s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.
The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on “investigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.”
The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the division’s front office, where the Trump administration’s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.
The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.
Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.
They are “generally disadvantaged” – by their genetics. Not the color of their skin.
This Chinese person:
Has roughly the same (if not more) melanin than this Mexican person:
Yet the former has, statistically, 20-25 IQ points more than the latter.
The discrimination against Asian by the affirmative action admissions programs are a tacit establishment admission that race is not a “social construct,” given that it certainly has nothing to do with “skin color.”
A History of an Anti-White Hoax
The system of Affirmative Action was enacted during the 1960s to give blacks more points on exams and advantages when applying for jobs as a crutch for their IQ handicap.
Most liberals and leftists know deep down inside the average black is naturally a lot dumber than the average white, which is why AA isn’t managed in a way that makes sense – for instance, basing it on household income. But you couldn’t do that, because poor whites score higher on intelligence and academic tests than wealthy blacks.
Note: Psychologists used to classify anyone with an IQ <80 as having a severe mental disability, but they changed it to <70 because the former measure was deemed “racist.” Though the average American black IQ is 83, many fall below 80.
So the argument that is made is that blacks should get institutional privilege because many of them are clinically mentally retarded, but there’s a whole bunch of other groups getting in on this racket too.
For example, why do “Latinos” get affirmative action? Aside from any historical context about “discrimination,” so-called “Latinos” aren’t even a race. While most Spanish-speakers in the US are some kind of Mestizo from Mexico, the ones who benefit the most from Affirmative Action are the smart ones with much higher white admixture (or simply Spanish whites born in Mexico) who get lead in their boxing glove when competing against non-Spanish speaking whites.
Just check out the members of the “Latino Leadership Association” at the Yale School of Management:
The Jewish narrative about white privilege and institutional racism has yet to catch on with anyone other than wealthy gullible white women, recent immigrant groups who want to cut corners, and really slow nig-nogs like Tariq Nasheed.
They have had five decades to make their point and not only did their programs fail, they are now starting to adversely impact average people’s lives as browning America becomes predictably poorer and poorer.
Trump & Sessions are now targeting non-white college applicants under the guise of reversing Affirmative Action https://t.co/j7HUgXnV4y
— Tariq Nasheed (@tariqnasheed) August 2, 2017
The “white privilege” conspiracy theory is the exact type of Big Lie Adolf Hitler documents the Jews of engaging in in Mein Kampf. To this day, with no sense of irony (why Jews are losing the post-modern culture war), Jews continue to Big Lie by Big Lying about what Hitler said about the Big Lie!
“But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the Fatherland to Justice.
All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” – Mein Kampf. Vol I, ch. X
But the Goyim know, so they can big lie no mo’.
Andrew Anglin contributed to this report.