Supreme Court Rules Against Immigrants Who Come to America to Live on Welfare

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 28, 2020

You would not say “no migrants on welfare” unless you were driven by a hatred for the color of the skin. This is a policy designed to target people of color who just want more welfare for their families.

Donald Trump is moving now to do things for his racist base who is angry that he is such a “virulent kike lover.”

The Orange President, who is considered by many to be evil, is now trying to cockblock anyone who comes to America seeking welfare. This is pure racism, given that the only people who would move to America in order to suck welfare benefits are brown people.

By stopping welfare parasites from entering America, the Orange Man is effecting a policy to “Make America White Again.”

And white people are evil.

NBC News:

The Supreme Court issued an order Monday allowing the Trump administration to begin enforcing new limits on immigrants who are considered likely to become overly dependent on government benefit programs.

The court voted 5-4. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan said they would have left a lower court ruling in place that blocked enforcement while a legal challenge works its way through the courts.

Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan are all Jewish. Once again, we see that JEWS are the ones who believe most strongly in compassion, i.e., giving the resources of white people to brown people.

That’s one of the main reasons why white people hate the Jews – because they don’t like that the Jews take their money and give it to brown people.

The Department of Homeland Security announced in August that it would expand the definition of “public charge,” to be applied to people whose immigration to the United States could be denied because of a concern that they would primarily depend on the government for their income.

In the past, that was largely based on an assessment that an immigrant would be dependent upon cash benefits. But the Trump administration proposed to broaden the definition to include noncash benefits, such as Medicaid, supplemental nutrition and federal housing assistance.

Anyone who would be likely to require that broader range of help for more than 12 months in any three-year period would be swept into the expanded definition.

But in response to a lawsuit filed by New York, Connecticut, Vermont, New York City and immigrant aid groups, a federal judge in New York imposed a nationwide injunction, blocking the government from enforcing the broader rule. Congress never meant to consider the kind of time limit the government proposed, the judge said, and the test has always been whether an immigrant would become primarily dependent on cash benefits.

The government has long had authority to block immigrants who were likely to become public charges, but the term has never been formally defined. The DHS proposed to fill that void, adding noncash benefits and such factors as age, financial resources, employment history, education and health.

The acting deputy secretary of the DHS, Ken Cuccinelli, said the proposed rules would reinforce “the ideals of self-sufficiency and personal responsibility, ensuring that immigrants are able to support themselves and become successful here in America.”

Why would anyone come to America if they cannot live off of welfare?

The Statue of Liberty poem says that brown people should come to America to live on welfare and this SCOTUS ruling violates that poem, which is the law of the land.

The Statue of Liberty poem, written by a Jew, is the foundation of our democracy.

Coming to America to live off of welfare is a part of our national identity. It’s who we are. We are all descended from migrant welfare parasites. The pilgrims came to America seeking food stamps and because they were being hunted by gangs in their home country.

Remind you of anyone?

Without Central American welfare parasites, America cannot survive.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS