SJW Professor Says Reason Itself is a White Christian Male Construct of Oppression

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 5, 2015

John D. CaputoCredit
John D. CaputoCredit

We all knew it had to eventually come to this: an SJW professor has condemned reason itself as a tool of White Christian Male oppression of colored folk.

The greatest thing ever is that I couldn’t satirize this. If I was going to satirize SJWs, I would write exactly what this guy told the New York Times.

Daily Caller:

A philosophy and religion professor at Syracuse University gave an interview to The New York Times Thursday in which he critiqued the notion of pure reason as simply being a “white male Euro-Christian construction.”

Prof. John Caputo was being interviewed by fellow philosophy professor George Yancy for the 13th installment of an interview series Yancy conducts with philosophers regarding racial topics.

“‘White’ is of the utmost relevance to philosophy, and postmodern theory helps us to see why,” Caputo says in the interview. “I was once criticized for using the expression ‘true north.’It reflected my Nordo-centrism, my critic said, and my insensitivity to people who live in the Southern Hemisphere. Of course, no such thing had ever crossed my mind, but that points to the problem. We tend to say ‘we’ and to assume who ‘we’ are, which once simply meant ‘we white male Euro-Christians.’

Insensitivity to people who live in the Southern Hemisphere.

There it is.

They have finally gone full-retard.

“I think that what modern philosophers call ‘pure’ reason — the Cartesian ego cogito and Kant’s transcendental consciousness — is a white male Euro-Christian construction,” he says. “White is not ‘neutral.’ ‘Pure’ reason is lily white, as if white is not a color or is closest to the purity of the sun, and everything else is ‘colored.’ Purification is a name for terror and deportation, and ‘white’ is a thick, dense, potent cultural signifier that is closely linked to rationalism and colonialism. What is not white is not rational. So white is philosophically relevant and needs to be philosophically critiqued — it affects what we mean by ‘reason’ — and ‘we’ white philosophers cannot ignore it.”

And there you have that: reason itself is a White concept which needs to be abolished. We will replace it with Negroid emotional hysteria. And if that causes society to collapse completely, well then, that’s a price we’re willing to pay.

For those who don’t know, Kant’s conception of “reason” is just basic logic. It is the accepted standard for how you use your mind to analyze information and draw conclusions based on likely outcomes.

Immanuel Kant hated Blacks and wanted to cause them hurt feelings out of hatred.
Immanuel Kant hated Blacks and wanted to cause them hurt feelings out of hatred.

An attack on reason can only be a metaphysical argument. And that is important. Everything about the current SJW system is based on metaphysical concepts, so it is not surprising he would attack Kant. The idea that “races are equal” is metaphysical, as is the idea that women are equal and want something other than children. It presupposes that we, as humans, exist outside of the order of nature which is based on science – or rather, science is based on it.

The only true philosophy is one which is drawn from the order of nature, and reason and science are the methods through which we understand this order and then seek to apply it to our own situations. We are imperfect, so our attempts to do this will be imperfect, but the goal was always the same.

Until Marxism.

We have a Jewish problem.
We have a Jewish problem.

Marxism forwarded the Jewish idea that instead of embracing the order of nature, we should fight against it, attempt to restructure the basic order of the universe for reasons of… well, the reasons for doing it change constantly, but they are never reasonable – rather, they are always emotional, because emotion is non-objective and thus easily manipulated.

The professor then, bizarrely (or not) goes on to attack freedom.

“The great scandal of the United States is that it has produced an anti-gospel, the extremes of appalling wealth and poverty,” he says. “But instead of playing the prophetic role of Amos denouncing the American Jeroboam, instead of working to close that gap, the policies of the right wing are exacerbating it … The popularity of such cruel ideas, their success in the ballot box, is terrifying to me. The trigger-happy practices of the police … on the streets of black America should alert everyone to how profoundly adrift American democracy has become — attacking the poor as freeloaders and criminals, a distorted and grotesque ideological exaggeration of freedom over equality. The scandal is that the Christian right has too often been complicit with a politics of greed and hatred of the other.”

Yes, to free the Blacks we need… less freedom. But we can only get to less freedom in order to give equality to the Blacks after we have abolished the racist White male Christian concepts of reason and logic.

This is where we are at now, as a society. Even if you supported this, could you honestly claim it was sustainable? How long can a guiding principle which condemns both reason and freedom maintain the course of a complex human system? Surely not indefinitely. No one could argue this can go on indefinitely.

But Jews, women, feminized men and various coloreds will continue to push it indefinitely.

So what is the plan?

It seems it may be time for an open discussion.