Scientists Brainstorm Excuses for Future Lockdowns

“This will keep the flu away.”

Scientists are trying really hard to come up with reasons why the lockdown should be put back in place after it is eased.

Fox News:

As states across America being to reopen, some scientists are voicing fears about so-called “superspreaders” who may be responsible for larger numbers of coronavirus cases through airborne transmission.

Although many businesses are reopening with stringent social distancing guidelines, those practices vary significantly from state to state and even from city to city within various states.

Kimberly Prather, an atmospheric chemist at University of California San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography, wrote in a recent perspective paper in Science that a review of existing literature provides evidence that the new coronavirus can linger in the air, perhaps even for hours, before entering a person’s lungs.

“Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is silently spreading in aerosols exhaled by highly contagious infected individuals with no symptoms. Owing to their smaller size, aerosols may lead to higher severity of COVID-19 because virus-containing aerosols penetrate more deeply into the lungs,” the paper concluded.

Coronavirus has been widely debunked. It’s only about as dangerous as the flu and most of the people who allegedly died from it were just too old and sick, and would have died anyways of something else.

These “experts” coming up with “concerns” and “fears” are literally civilization destroyers promoting DEATH BY INACTION.

What’s their plan? To force everyone to live this new house arrest lifestyle? The idea that that would only be necessary until there’s a vaccine ready is preposterous, because if waiting for vaccines in order to live a normal life is the plan, what happens when our rulers decide that there’s a new dangerous virus around? Are we going to live in and out of lockdowns for the rest of our lives? Are we ready to let them set up this precedent?

People have the right to decide for themselves if they want to risk catching some virus. We used to do it all of the time right up until around March. Every day, we chose to face life instead of living in fear of the cold, the flu, and whatever else. If a virus were more dangerous than the common cold, we’d still have the same right to decide if we want to risk ourselves out there.

The idea that people going out risks other people’s lives is absurd. People who choose not to risk their lives can stay at home, and people who don’t fear the flu won’t be breaking into their homes to cough on their faces.

We need to remember our rights and see all of this coronavirus hysteria for what it is: an excuse for the government push their real total control agenda.