November 12, 2019
You don’t really want to know what’s underneath the niqab.
Once in a while, Saudi Arabia produces some interesting headlines. There’s that thing they do where they track their women using their phones and manage them with a phone app as if they were characters from The Sims, and now this.
A promotional video published by Saudi Arabia’s state security agency categorises feminism, homosexuality and atheism as extremist ideas, even as the conservative Muslim kingdom seeks to promote tolerance and attract foreigners.
The animated clip posted on Twitter at the weekend by a verified account of the State Security Presidency said “all forms of extremism and perversion are unacceptable”.
Unfortunately, they have since deleted the video due to internet outrage.
It listed those concepts alongside takfir – the Islamist militant practice of labelling followers of other schools of Islam unbelievers.
“Don’t forget that excess of anything at the expense of the homeland is considered extremism,” said the promo’s voiceover.
As part of plans to open up society and attract foreign investment to transform Saudi Arabia’s oil-dependent economy, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has pushed for a more moderate form of Islam and promoted nationalist sentiment.
He has loosened social restrictions and launched a tourist visa and, as Saudi Arabia prepares to take over the presidency of the Group of 20 countries next year, Riyadh has chipped away at a guardianship system that assigns each woman a male relative to approve important decisions throughout their lives.
Under Saudi law, supporting groups classified as extremist organisations can lead to imprisonment.
Homosexuality and atheism have long been illegal and punishable by death in the absolute monarchy, where public protests and political parties are banned and the media is tightly controlled.
The idea that women are equal to men, and the idea that women should be allowed to do the same things men do, is indeed an extremist idea.
Claiming that there’s no significant difference between male and female even goes against what’s immediately observable.
Going against common sense and against what you see with your own eyes is extremist.
Atheists, in this sense, can also be considered extremists that dismiss the beauty of Creation as a set of social constructs stacked on top of some kind of random occurrence.
Both feminists and atheists deny what’s intuitive, immediately observable, common sense, and natural. In the company of these heretics, there’s another group of nature deniers: homosexuals.
Faggots violently refuse to accept that the anus is just for pooping, and they lay siege to it with their battering ram penises.
What these three groups have in common is that they reject Creation by denying the nature of things, and they work towards corruption and decay.
Opposing feminists, faggots, and atheists is opposing heresy.
Recognizing the differences between men and women, the beauty and divine nature of Creation, and the function of sex and body organs can only be labeled as extremism in a hellish landscape controlled by satanists.