March 9, 2018
Me right now. pic.twitter.com/m74hZsx1be
— Philip N Cohen (@familyunequal) March 8, 2018
These kikes are walking the line, Johnny Cash style.
Claiming that anything that happens on Twitter has anything at all to do with the First Amendment is just asking for it.
A judge is recommending that President Donald Trump mute rather than block some Twitter followers to resolve a First Amendment lawsuit.
Manhattan federal Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald on Thursday suggested a settlement as the preferred outcome after listening to lawyers argue whether it’s constitutional for Trump to block his critics.
The hearing stemmed from a lawsuit filed in July by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and seven people rejected by Trump after criticizing the Republican president.
Buchwald told lawyers they run the risk of establishing new law that they might not like if they resist a settlement. Otherwise, she’ll rule soon.
Yeah, they definitely risk that, which is why Trump should absolutely refuse any kind of settlement on this.
Let’s make a situation where we are having a full discussion about the First Amendment on social media. Because we can only win that.
If Trump isn’t allowed to exercise personal rights on Twitter, meaning the entire site is viewed as a public square, that means that the company is not allowed to ban right-wing trolls – let alone political advocates whose beliefs they have unilaterally decided are “immoral.”
So to be clear: we are hoping that the Judge does rule and that the ruling is that it is a Constitutional violation for Trump to block people on Twitter.
Then we bring a case of someone who was blocked for their politics, cite the ruling against Trump and BOOM – we in, boys. Forever.
Thus far, Twitter censorship has been definitively proven to be the single most effective political action the left has accomplished in decades. We have an army, standing by, ready to flood the place.
If we have free speech, we win the debate – every single time.