Richard Dawkins Attacks Clock Boy for Hoaxing, Then Immediately Cucks Out

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 21, 2015

Richard Dawkins was “under fire” as they say for posting a link to the YouTube video showing that Clock Boy is not some type of genius and did not invent a clock. All he did was take a clock apart to make it look like a bomb and then bring it to school.

But drawing attention to this fact is pure hatred.

Richard "I'm Sorry to Everyone" Dawkins.
Richard “I’m Sorry to Everyone” Dawkins.

So Dawkins backed down, because he’s a cuckolded faggot who claims to hate Moslems but will bow down to them if the SJWs demand it.

The Guardian:

Dawkins did not dispute that Mohamed should not have been arrested, but questioned whether the boy had truly “invented” the clock, as has been reported.

Mohamed, whose parents are from Sudan, was arrested, handcuffed and questioned by five police officers at MacArthur high school in Irvine on Monday. He was then suspended for three days.

He told MSNBC he was not allowed to call his parents and was accused of carrying a hoax bomb. He said: “I felt like I was a criminal, I felt like I was a terrorist. I felt like all the names I was called.”

But he did build a hoax bomb! This is now a known fact!

There is no possible reason you would unscrew a clock, make it look like a bomb and bring it to school unless you were purposefully trying to cause a panic!

He added: “In middle school I was called a terrorist, called a bomb maker, just because of my race.”

Poor thing. You sweet little dear.

Maybe you should have remained wherever the hell your from.

Oh yeah – Sudan.

Sudan is a magical place!
Sudan is a magical place, free of hurting feelings about mean names!

Please, go there. No one will call you a terrorist.

Actually, probably if you would have done this exact same bomb hoax thing at a school in Sudan, you’d now be in an adult prison.

In a controversy that largely played itself out on Twitter, Mohamed then received overtures from Silicon Valley tech companies, support from Hillary Clinton and an invitation to the White House from President Obama.

“White House.”

Let's stop calling it that.
Let’s stop calling it that.

I wonder if Obama is going to invite little Muhammed to the Lincoln bedroom?


Dawkins shamed the poor boy for lying about having invent the fake bomb (or I guess he did invent the fake bomb, but he did not invent either a clock or a real bomb), maybe because he hates Islam, which I guess makes him a racist somehow.

On Sunday, the emeritus fellow of New College, Oxford said he was simply looking for the truth of the Texas schoolboy’s story.

In a tweet, the scientist linked to a YouTube video entitled Ahmed Mohammed [sic] Clock is a FRAUD, in which user Thomas Talbot alleges Mohamed’s clock “is in fact not an invention. The ‘clock’ is a commercial bedside alarm clock removed from its casing”.

In his tweet, Dawkins said: “If this is true, what was his motive? Whether or not he wanted the police to arrest him, they shouldn’t have done so.” His next tweet said of the video: “This man seems to know what he’s talking about.”

See, he even came at it cucked.

If he wanted the police to arrest him for faking a bomb hoax – which seems to be what happened – why would Dawkins say “yeah but they shouldn’t have arrested him for trying to get arrested by faking a bomb.”

Why would you not get arrested for purposefully faking a bomb, even if your intent in faking the bomb was to get arrested?

What logic is that, Richie?

Subsequent tweets, issued against a growing storm of online protest, said: “Assembling clock from bought components is fine. Taking clock out of its case to make it look as if he built it is not fine. Which is true?

“Yes, there are other reasons why a boy might take a clock out of its casing & pretend he’d made it. Trying to impress teachers, for instance[.]”

Linking to an blogpost entitled Reverse Engineering Ahmed Mohamed’s clock … and Ourselves, Dawkins tweeted: “If the reassembled components did something more than the original clock, that’s creative. If not, it looks like hoax.”

He held out for a while, sort of. Then the cucking kicked into overdrive.

Dawkins eventually retreated. He devoted tweets to questioning police motives and tweeted a reference to the new leader of Britain’s opposition Labour party: “Sorry if I go a bit over the top in my passion for truth. Not just over a boy’s alleged ‘invention’ but also media lies about J[eremy] Corbyn.”

In an answer to a Twitter user who wrote: “I think you too frequently confuse ‘truth’ with ‘obsessive and unnecessary dedication to accuracy’”, Dawkins wrote: “That could well be true, in which case I apologise. I guess I’m a bit sensitive about being among the many fooled.”

He subsequently retweeted President Obama’s White House invitation to the boy.

I guess he’s afraid of getting the Watson treatment.

Related: Dr. Watson to Sell His Nobel Prize After Having Been Shunned for Saying Blacks are Not as Intelligent as Whites

I hope he’s going to eventually get so old he just comes out and says “yes, Blacks and Middle Easterners are less evolved, it is a scientific fact.”

But I’m not holding my breath.