These private companies are not acting based on what’s good for society. When they talk about “hate speech,” they’re actually talking about things that threaten their globalist, anti-white, anti-Christ agenda. Pedophilia is not one of those things, so it is tolerated.
Britain’s most notorious child-sex offenders are using mainstream websites such as YouTube, Twitter and Instagram to rebrand paedophilia as a harmless sexual preference, an investigation for The Mail on Sunday has found.
Hundreds of disturbing accounts are being set up every day which refer to both potential and prolific abusers as ‘MAPs’ – Minor-Attracted Persons – to escape the ‘stigma’ attached to the word paedophile.
The anonymous users have even created their own rainbow ‘MAP Pride’ flag – with some arguing they should be celebrated as a niche group alongside the LGBT community.
LGBT-style slogans such as ‘#MAPPride’ and ‘#Mappositivity’, are seen as an attempt to cast paedophilia as part of society’s wider move towards sexual liberation.
Material found online includes memes proclaiming ‘Gay MAPs are amazing’ and cartoon characters saying: ‘Repost if you think maps should be able to date minors.’
One paedophile account @SandMapMinorva – since suspended – posted: ‘Minor-attraction is natural.’
Profiles of the anonymous users, which use cartoon avatars rather than photographs, often list the ages of children they are most attracted to, in some cases as low as ‘two to seven’.
While social media giants remove users for posting racist or extremist material, the ‘MAP’ posts are allowed to stay – despite protests – because it is deemed acceptable to discuss attraction to minors as long as it does not ‘glorify’ paedophilia.
What an elastic definition of what’s allowed.
They don’t say the same about right-wing content, nationalism, racism, and anti-Semitism.
These social media platforms are more tolerant towards pedophilia than they are towards ideas that about half of the population agrees with, like not giving away your stuff to foreigners and not allowing blacks to burn your cities.
Do we really want these private companies to continue to dictate what people are allowed to say online?