Vatican’s Third Highest Ranking Official Charged with Pederasty

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 29, 2017



Australia’s highest-ranking Roman Catholic clergyman, Vatican treasurer Cardinal George Pell, has been charged by Australian police over sex allegations from “multiple complainants.” The Vatican has released a statement of support for Pell, citing his “honesty.”

“Cardinal Pell is facing multiple charges in respect of historic sexual offences,” Victoria state police deputy commissioner Shane Patton told the media in Melbourne on Thursday.

The extent of the charges the senior Vatican cardinal is facing has not been revealed by police. However, according to Patton, “there are multiple complainants relating to those charges.”

There might be up to 10 alleged victims, Australian news website reports, adding that they were minors at the time of the alleged assaults and are now aged from their late 20s to their early 50s.

The allegations are believed to stretch from the time that Pell was a priest in the Australian town of Ballarat to when he was Archbishop of Melbourne. It is alleged that the cardinal groomed boys at a swimming pool in Ballarat in the 1970s and committed sexual assaults at St Patrick’s Cathedral in Melbourne, according to The Australian.

The cardinal, who did not admit to any of the alleged offences and has denied reports that have been circulating in the media for months, was charged by summons to appear before a Melbourne court on July 18.

Since 2014, Pell has lived in the Vatican, with which Australia has no extradition treaty, meaning the cardinal could potentially avoid prosecution if he chose not to return to his home country.

Yeah, the Vatican is basically the faggot version of Israel.


However, the Australian Catholic Church said in a statement Thursday that the cardinal “will return to Australia, as soon as possible, to clear his name.”

The Vatican has released its own statement, stressing that Pope Francis has respect for Pell’s “honesty” and “energetic dedication” to his work on Church financial reform.

It went on to state that Pell has “openly and repeatedly condemned as immoral and intolerable the acts of abuse committed against minors; has cooperated in the past with Australian authorities…has supported the Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors; and finally, as a diocesan bishop in Australia, has introduced systems and procedures both for the protection of minors and to provide assistance to victims of abuse.”

Pell, 76, was promoted to cardinal in 2003 and three years ago he was appointed to serve as the Vatican treasurer, considered to be the third most powerful post behind the Pope.

Funny that the treasurer is the third most powerful person in the Church, no? We won’t dwell on the implications of that particular fact just now, however.

This is certainly unfortunate for the church at a time when they were already having some relatively serious troubles.


I have nothing against Catholics.

But the fact is, the homosexual mafia has taken over this organization.

And it was a pretty easy and obvious target.

What other job are you both:

a) expected not to be married, and

b) spending large portions of your time around pubescent boys?

I mean, a homosexual becoming a Catholic priest is about as obvious as a rock-climber becoming a rock-climbing instructor.

Come on now.

Celibate Priests: Flawed Concept?

To be perfectly honest with you, this was a flawed concept to begin with, this idea of celibate priests.

I think there are men who would naturally want to be celibate, but they are basically generally anti-social. They used to become monks. Or rambling drunken gamblers.

The priest concept is an extremely social role. That is the whole idea of it, for the majority of the clergy. They are dealing with the public. A person who is naturally drawn to celibacy is also going to want to avoid human relationships, generally.

So they were pretty much asking for this when they set up the order this way.

I mean, I don’t know what they think.

Do people know that the Eastern Catholic Church doesn’t do this? Even though it is effectively the same church?

Yes, this is a church. And I promise you, before we are through, a cross will hang in it again. And the bodies of the people who took it down will be hanging outside of it. 

I’m not a Catholic. So I don’t have any idea what anyone is thinking about this. But it seems to me that it is almost certain that the overwhelming majority of the priests, currently, are homosexuals.


This is going to be a massive story, of course, which will drag on for years.

Because the Jews love this. They love attacking Christianity. And they hate the Catholic Church to this day, regardless of the fact that we have a full-on SJW Pope on our hands right now.

They are going to refer to this as a “pedophile scandal.”

That is not what it is.

This is the definition of pedophilia, via Wikipedia:

Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.



An alter-boy is 11-14ish.


When this whole faggot priest thing first broke in the 90s and 00s, they couldn’t say “homosexual abuse scandal,” because that would be politically incorrect. So instead, they redefined the word “pedophile” and called it a “pedophilia scandal.”

Except that the word “pedophile” still means, in psychiatric terms, what it always meant. This force colloquial usage of the word as a euphemism for homosexuality is a media hoax to create the narrative of “good faggots” and “bad faggots.” In fact, all faggots are obsessed with teenage boys, and should be thrown off roofs.

This “a pedophile is anyone attracted to someone under the legal age of consent” is utterly nonsensical.

It would mean that if you think this cover is titillating:

And you live in one of the green or greenish-brown states on this map:

Then you are a pedophile. Because in the green states, the age of consent is 18, and in the greenish brown states, it’s 17.

However, if you live in one of the blue states, where the age of consent is 16, then you’re in the clear. Also if you live pretty much anywhere outside of America, you’re cool.

However, if that picture would have been taken a few months earlier – she had been sixteen for 4 months when it was taken – then we would all be pedophiles.

Does this make logical sense?

Of course not.

This media redefining of the word “pedophile” was a method of the sickening Jew media to protect homosexuals.

Some Faggots are Actual Pedophiles

While all faggots are obsessed with teenage boys – that is a fact – some of them actually do like little kids also.

We see this with the whole “gay adoption” phenomenon, where the state assists two homosexuals in kidnapping a child as a sex slave. And yes, that is always what it is. That is what it is in every. Single. Case.


There is no situation of “gay adoption” where the child is not being used sexually by the “parents.”

That said, the majority of homosexuals are not interested in adopting children, even though they have that option.

So, I don’t know what portion are into prepubescent children, but I don’t think it is 100%.

However, the faggot who only is sexually interested in grown men is a myth. It is also a myth that there are “moral faggots” who are against pederasty or even pedophilia.

I don’t know, maybe there are some homosexuals who think you shouldn’t be molesting 5-year-old boys. That is possible. However, I find it very unlikely that any faggot would ever rat out another faggot for doing that, because homosexuals are a cult and they act like the Jews.

Of course, a faggot who takes sexual advantage of a confused teenager is also evil in the absolute sense.

But we should not be conflating all of this.

We should use scientific definitions of real words the way they are supposed to be used.

Oh, But There’s a Bonus

What the other thing this “pedophile” redefining did what allow them an inroad to normalize actual pedophilia.

They’re been trying this lately, you know.

Despite crucifying the Jew MILO for having said exactly what all “gays” believe, they are in the process of testing the waters with “it’s fine if the child consents”-type arguments. Salon Magazine has published a “non-offending” pedophile saying that he likes little kids but doesn’t touch them and society should accept him instead of throwing him off a roof.

In these arguments, they always mix in this new definition of pedophilia, conflating attraction to a 15-year-old with D-cups – which most men would be, physically, as a biological impulse – with attraction 5-year-old. Like it’s the same thing, because it’s all “children” under the age of consent.

Age of Consent Laws are Stupid

The concept of age of consent laws is retarded, designed only for a degenerate society, which does not honor virgin marriage.

Read the history of this concept. It was always related to marriage, historically, until people got mad about prostitutes being too young.

History does matter. Despite what the boomers told us, we do not exist in a vacuum.

What we should have now is age of marriage laws, which should be first menstruation, generally. Although now, due to the degenerate society itself and birth control pills putting estrogen in the water, girls are having premature puberty, so probably it shouldn’t be at first menstruation until that problem is fixed.

Historically in European Christendom, the average age of marriage for a female was 12-14.

In the United States, up until the 1880s – that’s probably when your great-grandparents were born – the marriage age was 10-12. It was the empowerment of women during the turn of the century that led to changes in the laws for communist-oriented liberation purposes.

Our societies were much healthier then.

A society that does not have virgin marriage is like a society without religion. The only historical example of this is African niggerism, and some other sub-80 IQ groups of barbaric savages.

Look, we have statistics here, people.

If a girl has had sex with even one man before getting married, she is 35% more likely to end her marriage in divorce.

And this number goes up with the number of partners.

Women who refuse to honor their duty to protect their virginity until marriage – and this is the duty of the woman, basically one of her only social duties other than raising children – should be considered whores.

Obviously, however, this isn’t practical right now. Our society is deranged. I don’t even blame individual women who are not respecting their virginity, as this is a social problem created by Jews, not a problem of individual choices made by individual women.

Expecting women to keep their virginity now would be like expecting people to find religion when the churches are all run by homosexual perverts and Zionist psychopaths.

Thankfully, I believe you can turn a hoe into a housewife. And we’re going to have to, because all of these skanks are hoes. So this generation, we’re just going to have to make this work.


So I guess the age of consent at 16 is where it should be?

I don’t know that it really even matters.

And talking about “age of consent” for homosexuality is just insane. Homosexuality itself should be outlawed. These people should be getting thrown off roofs.

More like “Barbaric The Sun Attacks ISIS for the One Thing They Did Good.”

Homosexual men do prey on young boys, whereas men do not prey on women – this is a feminist myth – because women choose their partners. So I guess, if you’re going to allow faggotism in your society, the age of consent for it should be higher than for heterosexuality.

The entire situation is barbaric and absurd.

It’s difficult to even process how it could be fixed, other than through the most extreme and outrageous means.

One Final Thing on the Faggot Issue Here

Faggots are a cult.

That is how they should be looked at.

They infiltrate things, in the way the Jews do, and the protect each other, in the way the Jews do. There is a nepotism.

That was the problem with Ernst Rohm in the SA, who Hitler had to put down after taking control.

It wasn’t even so much that they were overly socialist, or the specific fact that Rohm himself loved cock. It was that he was filling the ranks with other homos, and these people are twisted. They have their own totally separate agenda.

And as far as the Catholic thing – this is not a cult like the Mormons, where they spread it by reproducing in the normal fashion. They have to recruit. That is what the Priest thing is. They are recruiting. The overwhelming majority of homosexual faggots – whether they admit it or not – were molested

There is only one real solution to this problem and it involves three things:

  1. Two able bodied young men
  2. A piece of rope
  3. A building at least three stories tall