Obama Tells Americans to Love Good Moslem Terrorists

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 7, 2015

The evil African ruler of America, Obinju Obadingu, has finally made a statement on the Moslem terrorist attack in San Bernardino.

Looking haggard and disgruntled, the occupying African dictator claimed that the husband and wife who attacked a retard center were “radicalized,” indicating that it was something that was done against them and not their own responsibility.

The FBI is still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but here is what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by one of their coworkers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas, or that they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home. But it is clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against America and the West. They had stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition, and pipe bombs. So this was an act of terrorism, designed to kill innocent people.

He then focused on the most important point of all: that Americans don’t turn against Islam simply because Moslems are slaughtering them.

This is what the better part of the speech was about: that we must continue to embrace Islam, even as they murder us.

We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam. That, too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world — including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject their hateful ideology. Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim. If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.

Excuse me, evil monkey, but wouldn’t a zero percent Islamic population result in a zero percent Islamic terrorism rate?

So maybe then we should ask: how much terrorism is it worth to have the joys of an Islamic minority in our country?

As we know for a fact that there are going to be more Islamic terrorist attacks, with ever-increasing frequency, we really need to set some definite value on just how much these welfare parasites are worth to our nation.

The African dictator continued with his racism-shaming, telling people that “we” must love the terrorists.

But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination. It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country. It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim Americans should somehow be treated differently. Because when we travel down that road, we lose. That kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups like ISIL. Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.

There again “our values” are Islamic.

When did “our values” become Islamic, you damned dirty ape? When did it become “our responsibility” to risk being blown up in order not to be called “racists”?

Obviously, Islam was not “our values” when the country was founded.

Not a Moslem
Not a Moslem
Not a Moslem
Not a Moslem

And obviously we didn’t have a responsibility to avoid being called racists at that time, given that all our Founding Fathers literally owned Black people.

So, if now it is “our values” to embrace Islam and risk mass death so as not to be called racists, when did this change happen? What precipitated this change? Was there a vote to change our official national value system to Islam and anti-racism?

And besides Islam and not being called a racist, what else do “our values” now entail, o holy monkey? Is there some new document I am unaware of which outlines this new value system of our nation? Surely, a change this massive in the core values of the country must be documented? You must be referencing something specific, which exists as a part of the public record?


On the “values” thing he also said:

My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a belief in human dignity — that no matter who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like, or what religion you practice, you are equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law.

What about slavery?

"No matter who you are"????
“No matter who you are … you are equal”????

And the mass relocation of the Indian savages?

Our country was not founded on egalitarianism, that is simply an obvious revisionist lie. A bizarrely huge revisionist lie.

The unhinged bastard also called for Americans to be stripped of their weaponry so as to keep Moslems from slaughtering them.

Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun. What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.

How insane?

What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to be on the loose in the country, Barack?


These hajis also had bombs. Bombings tend to be much more deadly than shootings.

A Moslem in England just stabbed-up a subway.

France has strict gun control laws, and somehow hajis managed to kill 130 people there last month with guns.

If you have terrorists in the country – a practice which Obama is openly defending – they are going to figure out a way to kill you.

We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject any gun safety measures. But the fact is that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies — no matter how effective they are — cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual is motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology. What we can do — and must do — is make it harder for them to kill.

You must lose your freedom for diversity. Because otherwise, vibrant enrichers will kill you on the street, or in your retard center, or wherever. Obviously, even if you give up your freedoms, they will still kill you, but maybe it will be “harder for them to kill.”

This is insane, insane, insane.

How have we gotten to this point?