Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Promised “Defunding” of Sanctuary Cities

Daily Stormer
April 26, 2017

How long did he have to practice in the mirror to attain such a perfect cuck face?

Rarely have I ever seen such a reckless rush by the political class to piss off such a large portion of the population. I mean, don’t get me wrong, these faggots ignore the will of the people constantly. But they usually try to pass their toxic agenda slowly enough to limit popular anger.

However, we’re seeing a free-for-all here, with the Trump administration going back on most of it’s promises, and the rest of the government blocking the rest, all in a matter of a few weeks.

They probably think that with Trump muzzled, they now have nothing to fear.

New York Times:

A judge in San Francisco on Tuesday temporarily blocked President Trump’s efforts to starve localities of federal funds when they limit their cooperation with immigration enforcement, a stinging rejection of his threats to make so-called sanctuary cities fall in line.

Wow, I was sure he was a homo, but I guess he’s married to a lesbian or something.

The judge, William H. Orrick of United States District Court, wrote that the president had overstepped his powers with his January executive order on immigration by tying billions of dollars in federal funding to immigration enforcement. Judge Orrick said only Congress could place such conditions on spending.

You know what, I agree.

Cutting funding for sanctuary cities is a pretty stupid idea.

Instead, if there’s cities who refuse to comply with federal law, we should send in the military to occupy them. The mayors responsible should be summarily executed for inciting a rebellion against the federal government.

This “defunding” stuff is pretty gay, tbh.

The ruling, which applies nationwide, was another judicial setback for the Trump administration, which has now seen three immigration orders stopped by federal courts in its first 100 days. And as with the rulings halting his two temporary bans on travel from several predominantly Muslim countries, the president’s own words were used against him.

I’m still unclear about how it’s possible for some random district judge to overrule the president. Who came up with this nonsense?

By judges appointed by the president’s political enemies, no less.

Also, isn’t there some corruption case to be made here? This judge gave Obama 200 grand for his campaign, and then was given a prestigious appointment. Am I the only one who thinks that smells bad?

Though Justice Department lawyers argued in the case that the government did not intend to withhold significant amounts of money, the judge noted that the president and Attorney General Jeff Sessions had suggested the punishment could be far greater.

“If there was doubt about the scope of the order, the president and attorney general have erased it with their public comments,” Judge Orrick wrote.

While the order is only a temporary injunction until the judge issues a broader ruling on the executive order’s constitutionality, he strongly signaled that San Francisco and Santa Clara County, the plaintiffs in the case, were likely to win a permanent victory. It was also an early verdict on the question of whether the White House can coerce cities and counties into helping federal immigration agents detain and deport immigrants who are not authorized to be in the country.

Cities and counties are already “coerced” into doing that, because it’s the law. 

So the question is, “can the government ‘coerce’ people into obeying the law?”

This is what an actual Judge is asking here.