New Scandal: Hillary Stealing Money From Poorest Supporters

Zeiger and Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 16, 2016


Even from her death bed, the witch strikes!

Democrats, and leftists in general, like to present themselves as the great defenders of the poor and oppressed masses. Inversely, they’ll portray right wingers as corporate shills.

But in actual fact, these people have infinite contempt for working class people. They hate the poor with a burning passion. Which partially explains why all their policies end up hurting the most vulnerable elements in society.

This is just another example of that reality.

The Observer:

Wells Fargo fraud department inundated with calls from low-income Clinton supporters reporting repeated unauthorized charges.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign is stealing from her poorest supporters by purposefully and repeatedly overcharging them after they make what’s supposed to be a one-time small donation through her official campaign website, multiple sources tell the Observer.

The overcharges are occurring so often that the fraud department at one of the nation’s biggest banks receives up to 100 phone calls a day from Clinton’s small donors asking for refunds for unauthorized charges to their bankcards made by Clinton’s campaign. One elderly Clinton donor, who has been a victim of this fraud scheme, has filed a complaint with her state’s attorney general and a representative from the office told her that they had forwarded her case to the Federal Election Commission.

“We get up to a hundred calls a day from Hillary’s low-income supporters complaining about multiple unauthorized charges,” a source, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of job security, from the Wells Fargo fraud department told the Observer. The source claims that the Clinton campaign has been pulling this stunt since Spring of this year. The Hillary for America campaign will overcharge small donors by repeatedly charging small amounts such as $20 to the bankcards of donors who made a one-time donation. However, the Clinton campaign strategically doesn’t overcharge these donors $100 or more because the bank would then be obligated to investigate the fraud.


I literally can’t even.

“We don’t investigate fraudulent charges unless they are over $100,” the fraud specialist explained. “The Clinton campaign knows this, that’s why we don’t see any charges over the $100 amount, they’ll stop the charges just below $100. We’ll see her campaign overcharge donors by $20, $40 or $60 but never more than $100.” The source, who has worked for Wells Fargo for over 10 years, said that the total amount they refund customers on a daily basis who have been overcharged by Clinton’s campaign “varies” but the bank usually issues refunds that total between $700 and $1,200 per day.

The fraud specialist said that Clinton donors who call in will attempt to resolve the issue with the campaign first but they never get anywhere. “They will call the Clinton campaign to get their refund and the issue never gets resolved. So they call us and we just issue the refund. The Clinton campaign knows these charges are small potatoes and that we’ll just refund the money back.”

The source said that pornography companies often deploy a similar arrangement pull. “We see this same scheme with a lot of seedy porn companies,” the source said. The source also notes that the dozens of phone calls his department receives daily are from people who notice the fraudulent charges on their statements. “The people who call us are just the ones who catch the fraudulent charges. I can’t imagine how many more people are getting overcharged by Hillary’s campaign and they have no idea.”

The source said he’s apolitical but noted that the bank’s fraud department is yet to receive one call from a Donald Trump supporter claiming to have been overcharged by Trump’s campaign. “I’m only talking to you because what Hillary’s doing is so messed up, she’s stealing from her poorest supporters.”

This is a new low. In fact, this is…


But Clinton’s whole career is based on unhinged criminality, so this isn’t really breaking any new ground.

But still.

It looks really, really bad.

Hilariously bad.

This woman couldn’t even be a cartoon villain. People would complain that it’s too “unrealistic.” It’s like if a Bond villain pick-pocketed his own henchmen to finance his operation. Who’d buy that?

I mean, think about it.

There was a meeting.

Her advisors were like, “we’re running out of money, fam.”

And she went, like, “lol, I got it. We’ll commit credit card fraud on our low-income supporters.”

And they went ahead and did exactly that. Systematically.

Multiple people had to have been aware of this and approved it.

Of course, she could have just used some of her hundreds of millions in personal wealth – it’s perfectly legal to fund your own campaign. But she appears to be completely addicted to the scam. It’s a rush for her to lie and rip people off, to see if she can get away with it.

As Trump said, the Clinton’s are grifters. And that term was especially apt, as grifters don’t really run their confidence scams for the money. At least not primarily, based on the personal accounts of famous confidence men who have talked or written about it. Mainly, they do it for the thrill.


One question: what’s going to happen to your state pensions once she’s in charge, boomers?