January 16, 2020
You really have to just shake your head in wonder that so many men still tolerate this completely morally bankrupt society. I cannot even think of what the incentives for playing along are anymore. There is certainly no point for the average man to even attempt marriage when women are enabled and encouraged to fleece their husbands and to then spend all their ill-gotten money on trips to Europe, boxed wine and dog charities.
See, here’s how our current system works. Lawyers (read: Jews) get rich by working together with women to steal a man’s wealth and then to get their cut. They use badge nigger golems with guns, tats and ‘roids to roll up like a goon squad and threaten to put men in cages if they fail to give the bitch and the Jew what they’ve stolen.
What’s frustrating is that at any step in the process, we could just be better by not participating in any of it. Jews will never stop Jewing, but women could stop torturing their husbands and badge niggers could tell the anti-male courts to enforce their own bullshit laws – so 2/3 ain’t bad.
But no. No one is throwing their body on the gears of the evil divorce rape machine. That is, nobody except this brave modern-day samurai.
A Kansas man has thrown down the gauntlet to his ex-wife and her attorney — seeking court permission to settle their child custody case “on the field of battle” with a sword fight.
David Ostrom, 40, claims in court papers that ex-wife Bridgette Ostrom, 38, and her attorney, Matthew Hudson, have already “destroyed (him) legally” in their ongoing legal battle in her hometown in Iowa.
“I now wish to give them the chance to meet me on the field of battle, where I will REND THEIR SOULS from their … bodies,” Ostrom wrote in the filing, according to the Carroll Times Herald.
Just like in my Chinese cartoons.
Jews and women don’t have souls though. But I suppose that was just a figure of speech.
He asked the judge for a three-month delay so he could obtain Japanese samurai swords ready for his planned combat.
Ostrom, of Paola, said he got the idea after seeing the New York case of Richard Luthmann, the Staten Island attorney who also sought trial by combat to settle a beef with another lawyer and his clients.
“To this day, trial by combat has never been explicitly banned or restricted as a right in these United States,” Ostrom argued in court records, adding that it was used “as recently as 1818 in British Court.”
I remember that trial by combat. One of the combatants was duel-wielding pistols, but the other had a superior nippon steel katana.
It wasn’t even close.
He told the Des Moines Register that his wife could choose her attorney as her “champion” to stand in for her in battle.
“I think I’ve met Mr. Hudson’s absurdity with my own absurdity,” he told the paper. “If Mr. Hudson is willing to do it, I will meet him. I don’t think he has the guts to do it.”
Hudson referred to himself as the “potential combatant” in his own cheeky legal response filed in Shelby County District Court.
“Although the respondent and potential combatant do have souls to be rended, they respectfully request that the court not order this done,” Hudson wrote, according to the reports.
He noted that the “potentially life-ending ramifications” of a duel “surely outweigh” their fight over property tax and custody issues.
Judge Craig Dreismeier wasn’t amused.
“Until the proper procedural steps to initiate a court proceeding are followed, this court will take no further action concerning any motion, objection or petition filed by either party at this time,” the judge ruled.
America used to be a nation of freemen who had the right to defend their property and their honor. Duels and street-fights were common. They were common even in Europe, where they were banned. Men who had a dispute could just settle things like men.
And it turns out that men are a lot less likely to start shit when they know they could end up in a battle to the death.
But there was no money to be made from that, so the whole concept had to be done away with, eventually.
I’ll tell you one thing though: state-sanctioned katana duels would be far preferable to the sick monkey Jew traveling circus that we have going for us now. All men should start demanding trial by combat at any and all of their court proceedings from this point forward.
And yes, you must specifically ask for the superior Japanese katanas as your weapon of choice.