November 5, 2016
The revolutionary fervor sweeping the West has pulled the rug from beneath the hairy Hobbit feet of the perpetual Semitic menace. In France, Austria, the United States and beyond, the elite “left” and the “right” have merged into political coalitions seeking to quash outbreaks of nationalist insurrection that opposes non-white immigration, neo-liberal capitalism and unending foreign military adventures for the geopolitical benefit of Israel.
In response, Jews have shattered their once reliable Funhouse mirror – the mass media – now that people have stopped listening. By and large, Jews have dropped the old fairy tale of diversity being some intrinsic economic or social good, and now have resorted to making threats and practicing political coercion. As the flame rises, they are throwing everything against it in hopes that historically unprecedented non-white immigration to the West will let them run out the clock and fully impose their plans.
The once invisible enemy, reflexively reacting to the numerous blows lodged against the “Globalist” curtain, is now audibly squawking, “Oy vey, that hurt you goyim pigs!”
The vile, genetic criminal (((James Traub))), an in house writer for the New York Times and active member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), last summer penned a confessional piece that has re-emerged, talking about the need for a more active billionaire, cosmopolitan and non-white coalition to ratchet up pressure on white working and middle class people. They hope that the combination of elite money and power with increasingly large non-white numbers can effectively disenfranchise and ultimately uproot and vanquish the indigenous people of Europe and the pioneering whites of the colonial Western nations in a manner similar to what Jews did to the Palestinians.
For all this talk about unrestricted globalism being a “21st century inevitability,” it sure seems to require a lot of work, money and political oppression to keep these policies in place.
The Jew Traub writes for Foreign Policy:
Yes, it’s possible that all the political pieces will fly up into the air and settle down more or less where they were before, but the Brexit vote shows that shocking change isn’t very shocking anymore. Where, then, could those pieces end up? Europe is already pointing in one direction. In much of Europe, far-right nativist parties lead in the polls. So far, none has mustered a majority, though last month Norbert Hofer, a member of Austria’s far-right Freedom Party, which traffics in Nazi symbolism, came within a hair of winning election as president. Mainstream parties of the left and right may increasingly combine forces to keep out the nationalists. This has already happened in Sweden, where a right-of-center party serves as the minority partner to the left-of-center government. If the Socialists in France do in fact lose the first round, they will almost certainly support the conservative Republicans against the far-right National Front.
Perhaps these informal coalitions can survive until the fever breaks. But the imperative of cohabitation could also lead to genuine realignment. That is, chunks of parties from the left and right of center could break away to form a different kind of center, defending pragmatism, meliorism, technical knowledge, and effective governance against the ideological forces gathering on both sides. It’s not hard to imagine the Republican Party in the United States — and perhaps the British Conservatives should Brexit go terribly wrong — losing control of the angry, nationalist rank and file and reconstituting themselves as the kind of Main Street, pro-business parties they were a generation ago, before their ideological zeal led them into a blind alley. That may be their only alternative to irrelevance.
The issue, at bottom, is globalization. Brexit, Trump, the National Front, and so on show that political elites have misjudged the depth of the anger at global forces and thus the demand that someone, somehow, restore the status quo ante. It may seem strange that the reaction has come today rather than immediately after the economic crisis of 2008, but the ebbing of the crisis has led to a new sense of stagnation. With prospects of flat growth in Europe and minimal income growth in the United States, voters are rebelling against their dismal long-term prospects. And globalization means culture as well as economics: Older people whose familiar world is vanishing beneath a welter of foreign tongues and multicultural celebrations are waving their fists at cosmopolitan elites. I was recently in Poland, where a far-right party appealing to nationalism and tradition has gained power despite years of undeniable prosperity under a centrist regime. Supporters use the same words again and again to explain their vote: “values and tradition.” They voted for Polishness against the modernity of Western Europe.
Perhaps politics will realign itself around the axis of globalization, with the fist-shakers on one side and the pragmatists on the other. The nationalists would win the loyalty of working-class and middle-class whites who see themselves as the defenders of sovereignty. The reformed center would include the beneficiaries of globalization and the poor and non-white and marginal citizens who recognize that the celebration of national identity excludes them.
When you actually read into what Traub is saying, it’s clear that he’s talking mostly about Jews when he says”marginal citizens” who are beneficiaries of globalization.
Jews lead open border agendas everywhere in the world except for Israel. They seek to weaken and ultimately extinguish white host populations, because it allows them to rule and set policy with no challenges.
Jews only feel comfortable when they are lording over truly politically defenseless people, like in Peru, which elected a Jewish Wall Street banker as president.
The Jews, as a class, have demonstrated no mercy, no diplomacy, no sense of ethics or justice in their dealings with us. They have turned this into a zero sum game of extermination, they truly believe they are a master race, and don’t consider that making such a proposition is so dangerous. Nobody will help them when our revolution regains the political upper hand, we will show these (((elites))) the same impunity they have shown us as their skulls crackle beneath our collective boot.