Nearly 18 months ago now, I stated that the so-called coronavirus was simply a rebranding of the flu and other respiratory viruses. This has continued to play out, and been proved true.
The PCR test has been confirmed to be a scam. The creator of the test said explicitly that the test could not be used to test for infectious disease.
Even if you go read about the PCR test for infectious disease and decide it makes sense, it is Lord Fauci himself who said that any cycle count over 35 would create a false positive.
“If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period,” Fauci told “This Week in Virology” on a July 16, 2020 podcast. Although Fauci has repeatedly gone back and changed things he’d said, but he hasn’t changed his statement on this issue.
On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a piece entitled “Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.,” where they admitted that in the states they looked at, 90% of tests were effectively false positives due to the cycle count.
(Start at about 4:00.)
This issue then quickly disappeared from the public discussion. The way it works now is that the health authorities – i.e., the government of any country – changes the number of cycles they do based on how many positives they want. And of course, the rule remains that anyone who tests positive for the virus is put down as having died from the virus. So both the case count and death count can be easily modified arbitrarily.
After the vaccines began spreading, the CDC announced that they would be using different cycle counts for vaxxed and unvaxxed people. (He’s a “fact checker” admitting that and saying it doesn’t matter “because of science,” without mentioning that Fauci himself made the above statements. They interview a guy who says 40 or 45 is fine.)
They said that only the “low” cycle count of less than 29 cycles would be accepted for those who have been vaxxed. The previous standard was, as show above, 35 or over. And they specifically said these new guidelines will only apply to the vaccinated.
Of course, the alleged “variants” of this new virus that doesn’t actually exist are being “discovered” using ultra high cycle rates, and then “tested” using high cycle rates.
Basically, it is very easy for them to use these tests to create any single narrative they want to create. If they want to say the vaxx is working, they lower the rate, as they’ve already done. If they want to say a new variant of the virus is breaking through the vaxx, they up the rate. If people are dying from the vaxx, they up the rate and give them a positive PCR test.
I’m not claiming to be a scientist here. I’m not making any bold statements. I am simply able to understand that these people themselves say that anything 35 or higher is positive, and yet they continue to use that number of cycles in testing regularly, unless they want the case count to go down, in which case they issue a guidance saying “nothing over 28.” This is very straightforward. You don’t need to be a scientist.
The Real Coronavirus
As far as finding some kind of coronavirus – we noted all the way back in July of 2020 that the CDC had published this on their website:
A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.
You can read more about this by simply looking up “false positive common cold.”
The common cold, you see, is a coronavirus.
The description of an infection from a common cold on the CDC website is identical to what is called “a mild case of covid-19.”
So although the PCR cycling makes a real positive test unnecessary, it is in theory possible that a PCR test could bring up a real positive – it would just be the common cold.
Most of the “serious cases of coronavirus” that you see on TV with people in the hospital are the flu combined with a false test. In 2018, 80,000 people died from the flu, according to the CDC. When you add in the fact that the CDC was in 2020 and 2021 mixing in heart attacks and cancer deaths with coronavirus deaths (all the way up to motorcycle crashes…!), there is no need for a new virus to explain what we are seeing. In fact, if a new virus did exist, it would be redundant, as it would only be killing people who otherwise would have died from something else.
To this day, no evidence has been presented for a pandemic of any kind. There also remains no actual evidence of any new virus. From start to finish, this is all fake.
Even people critical of the virus regime continue to falsely claim that a virus exists. Part of that is that right-wingers felt like they got a big win when the media came out and pushed the Wuhan Lab Leak Hoax. “Media admits that Trump was right!” is something that carries a lot of weight with these people, regardless of the content of the claim. But the other part is that people want to believe in the virus because they believe that completely inventing the concept that there is a virus is too big of a hoax, even for the hoax masters.
The reality is that the hoax will always be as big as they can get people to believe.
Think about it: they are telling you that the souls of girls can mistakenly enter the bodies of boys, before birth, in some kind of metaphysical mixup. That is a much bigger hoax than simply looking at a category of existing diseases and saying “this is actually a new disease.”
People need to start calling this out, because it is only the truth that will set us free.
If you’ve bought into the lies, I understand this is embarrassing, but we get nothing by continuing to play pretend.