January 22, 2019
We’ve got another vicious state crackdown on a would-be incel revolutionary.
Or perhaps a crackdown on an incel who did nothing other than get mad on the internet and then delete his post before he was chased down and thrown in a cage by the feds.
A Provo man is a facing felony threat of terrorism charge after he posted a mass shooting threat, targeting females, to Facebook.
According to a probable cause statement,27-year-old Provo resident Christopher Cleary posted the following threat on Facebook:
“All I wanted was a girlfriend, not 1000 not a bunch of hoes not money none of that. All I wanted was to be loved, yet no one cares about me I’m 27 years old and I’ve never had a girlfriend before and I’m still a virgin, this is why I’m planning on shooting up a public place soon and being the next mass shooter cause I’m ready to die and all the girls the turned me down is going to make it right by killing as many girls as I see. There’s nothing more dangerous than man ready to die”.
Well, that certainly sounds reasonable enough to me.
But not to the stinking feds, who serve as the enforcement arm of the Slut Occupation Government or SOG.
On Saturday, Provo dispatchers were alerted to the Cleary’s Facebook post by an officer from Colorado.
Provo police tracked Cleary’s IP address which led them to the area of 1042 S. 1000 E. in Provo.
At first, police were unable to find Cleary.
Provo officers were then contacted by FBI agents out of Colorado, and working together, they were able to locate Cleary at the McDonald’s at 1225 S. University Ave. in Provo by tracking his phone.
Police were concerned about the threat to females, since there were several women’s marches happening on Saturday, including one in Provo and another in Salt Lake City.
An FBI agent, along with a Utah County Major Crime Task Force detective escorted Cleary out off McDonald’s for questioning.
After reading him his Miranda rights, police say Cleary agreed to answer their questions.
“I asked him specifically about the threats he had made on Facebook, and he admitted to making the threats, but claimed to be upset and not thinking clearly when he did so,” the officer said in the probable cause statement.
Cleary was staying at a Provo Air BNB when he made the threats, according to police.
Officers looked through Cleary’s phone and did not find any more threats.
Cleary told officers he deleted his threatening Facebook post after receiving threats from people who saw the post.
Officers then arrested Cleary for the threat, citing public safety concern issues.
Cleary is also facing a probation violation charge out of Jefferson County, Colorado.
The arresting officer spoke with Cleary’s probation office who said Cleary has a history of making threats of killing women as well as felony stalking.
“The probation office in Colorado informed me that they intend to seek an extradition warrant for Cleary due to these threats, which also caused major concern to several agencies in Colorado, who thought Cleary might still be in their jurisdictions,” the arresting officer said. “During my interview with Cleary he made suicidal comments, and said he thought it might be better if he died. He talked about handcuffing himself to a tree in the middle of nowhere where no one could hear him scream as a means of killing himself.“
Starving himself to death in the woods.
And not a single whore would feel bad.
They would just make this face:
And then go on sucking Tyrone.
Cleary clearly did nothing. He didn’t even have a gun. At least none is mentioned anywhere. All he did was lash out on social media because he’s a 27-year-old virgin who has been denied sex by the SOG.
What sort of a situation do we have when normal men are denied the ability to engage in something so basic as sexual reproduction?
We used to look at society as having some kind of duty to its individual members. That was in fact the view going all the way back to the stone age, or the origins of humanity itself.
The role of the elite, or the ruling class, or the state, or whatever was at the top of a social order and charged with managing it, was to serve the people by providing them with a path to work, to do the right thing, and to be rewarded for doing so.
Now, somehow, we’ve decided that society owes the individual absolutely nothing, that it is every single atomized person’s own duty to simply figure out a way to make their own lives work.
At the same time as the system owes you nothing, there is an entire grid designed to control every aspect of your behavior.
It would be one thing if we had a completely lawless “every man for himself” type system, where you could do whatever you wanted to whomever you wanted. A Mad Max type of scenario. Then the people with power would rightly be able to say they owe you nothing.
Funnily enough, if a Mad Max scenario did break out, people would instinctively form tribes that protected each other and provided the ability for men to form families and play a meaningful role in the group.
(That actually was depicted in Mad Max: Beyond Thuderdome.)
Presently, we can only look at this system and draw the conclusion that it exists for the express purpose of preventing people from interacting in a way that is normal and social.
There is no justification for this beyond “something something something free market.”
That is the type of thing you read on National Review, at least.
I recently saw a piece from the top cuckold David French, wherein he was responding to Tucker Carlson’s populism. He said that it is every single individual’s personal duty to just figure out their own life, and they deserve zero guidance whatsoever from anyone in power.
The problem with populism — and indeed with much of American politics — is that it focuses on the political at the expense of the personal. As I’ve argued many times, there are wounds that public policy can’t heal. But populism too often pretends otherwise. It tells a fundamentally false story about Americans as victims of a heartless elite and their “worship” of market economics rather than the true story of America as a flawed society that still grants its citizens access to tremendous opportunity.
While there is much talk of a shrinking middle class, a large part of that shrinkage is, in fact, due to the fact that so many Americans are moving up. In other words, the upper class isn’t a set population of exploiters and elitists. It’s a growing population of workers and strivers. It’s full of people like my father-in-law, who ran away from his mountain home in Tennessee at age 15 to join the Marines, talked his way into college even though he was functionally illiterate, married a Christian woman, and raised three daughters who are each doing very well.
Telling people to go out and find some individual situation where everything works out based on an anecdote about someone you know is fundamentally deranged.
Part of the problem is the alleged dichotomy between the state and society, a dichotomy which should not actually exist. The tendency to make the distinction between the two social constructs so severe is a result of taking certain ideas from the enlightenment to an extreme that no enlightenment thinker ever would have imagined possible. Any rational person would conclude that the role of the state is to serve the people. When you push the concept of individualism as far as it has been pushed, the logical conclusion would be that the state should be abolished. But instead we have a massive state and no clear explanation of whom it is serving.
But without going into all of that, French answers his own questions.
Public policy absolutely COULD solve the problem of no gf – because public policy created the problem.
These public policies, specifically:
- Allowing women to vote and participate in public life
- Affirmative action for women in school and work
- On-demand abortion
- No-fault divorce
- Teaching women in schools that it is natural to lose your virginity and have a series of sexual partners before marriage
If the state had not made those decisions, all men would be able to find a wife somewhere about equal to their own level of wealth and attractiveness.
That is to say that simply reversing a bunch of experimental public policies could correct this situation.
On the other side of the system – ostensibly opposite to David French – you have the liberal Democrats, who believe that pushing ever more bizarre new forms of social-engineering along the exact same path as that which got us to where we presently are is the solution. They claim that more meddling in the nature of humanity, more regulation of human interaction, will lead to a perfect system of regulated interactions.
These two ideologies complement one another. One side claims that it is the job of the individual to navigate the system while the other side continually pushes to make the system more difficult to navigate.
Both stated paths – that of conservative and liberal – lead to further atomization of the individual, as we are further stripped of our humanity and shaped into the perfect consumer.
We have stopped being a society. We are now nothing more than a global marketplace, where every human interaction is treated as a transaction.
This is a gigantic disaster and the cost is human beings.
I stand with the incels, who are the single most oppressed class on earth.
I’m entirely sick of seeing no one in the world stand up for them.