August 16, 2017
This is what women fantasize about.
Strength, power, mystery, rebellion.
So what could possibly be sexier than Nazis, in this clown-world of tranny bathrooms and rigid political correctness?
At this point, even the most ardent shabbos goy must admit that our “bad boy” image is way more appealing than the drab, humorless atmosphere surround leftist circles.
Let’s talk about the systemic oppression suffered by the underprivileged. A-also, d-do you want to sleep with m-me? I need you to sign this consent form.
Last weekend, a group of neo-Nazis marched alongside other white supremacists and far right activists in Charlottesville. The chants and visual tools they used — from swastikas to wooden shields to “blood and soil” chants — revived rhetoric and imagery that many in America believed to be entirely eradicated: so beyond the pale of common morality that no reasonable person could possibly seek to revive it.
That belief, and the complacency it engendered, was erroneous. If anything, the sheer taboo nature of Nazi imagery — how thoroughly outside the window of acceptable discourse it is — has, to its supporters, only added to its appeal. Its very transgressive nature has made it easy for propagandists to market it as “sexy” and “forbidden.”
This is not new. The sexualization of fascist and, specifically, Nazi imagery precedes even World War II. In his The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, written against the backdrop of the Nazi rise to power in the late 1930s, critic and cultural theorist Walter Benjamin warned against the aesthetic dangers of fascist imagery, as it was predicated on eroticized notions of power and submission.
Notions of power and submission are at the core of the human sex drive. Women are hard-wired to be attracted to this:
While men are instinctively aroused by this:
Since fascists align themselves with nature, rather than going against it, it’s normal that we would be more attractive. The communists, in their drive to deny nature, make themselves dry, boring and totally devoid of sex-appeal.
“The logical result of Fascism is the introduction of aesthetics into political life,” Benjamin wrote, latter adding: “[Mankind’s] self-alienation has reached such a degree that it can experience its own destruction as an aesthetic pleasure of the first order.”
In other words, we culturally fetishize both absolute power and our own apocalyptic destruction, and fascism capitalizes on that fetishism to win supporters. And certainly the success of Hitler’s own propaganda lay in part in the Nazis’ ability to harness that erotic undertone to gain support. Consider German filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl’s Olympia documentary series, which celebrated (Aryan) German masculine beauty at the 1936 Olympics. (Riefenstahl’s conscious complicity with Nazi ideology has long been a subject of debate — she strenuously denied it — but it’s undeniable that her lens captured how Germans of the time saw their Germany identity, and their Führer.)
What the hell does that even mean?
It’s not the destruction of civilization that’s a source of “aesthetic pleasure.” Quite the opposite.
It’s the Jews and their lackeys who are explicitly trying to destroy everything, in order to create their “new world.” Our strength comes from our desire to preserve everything that is good in this world, from the environment to our history and culture.
Nazi art was a revival of classical culture, not a glorification of an apocalyptic future.
The taboo nature of Nazi imagery made it even more of an eroticized phenomenon after World War II. Cultural critic Susan Sontag noted this in her 1974 essay “Fascinating Fascism,” pointing out how the trappings of fascism (particularly here, too, Nazi fascism) gained a cultural potency from being illicit and forbidden.
“To those born after the 1940’s,” Sontag wrote, “fascism represents the exotic and the unknown. … Right-wing movements, however puritanical and repressive the realities they usher in, have an erotic surface. … Certainly Nazism is ‘sexier’ than communism.”
There you have it.
What plan do they have to counter this? None.
Their only plan is to shut us down.
But the thing is, the more we’re shut down, the more rebellious and dangerous we seem.
There’s no way out of it.
The Jews are caught in a Chinese finger trap. And unfortunately for them, they’re only capable of pulling.