European Court of Human Rights Says Forced Vaccination Isn’t Against Human Rights, May be Necessary

There is no longer even a pretense of basic human dignity remaining in this system.

We are now being treated as livestock.

Forced vaccination is now the official legal doctrine of the European Union.

This is from DW – German state media:

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg ruled Thursday that compulsory vaccinations would not contravene human rights law and may be necessary in democratic societies.

The ruling came following conclusion of a complaint brought to the court by Czech families regarding compulsory jabs for children.

“The measures could be regarded as being ‘necessary in a democratic society,'” the court judgment read.

Although the ruling did not deal directly with COVID-19 vaccines, experts believe it could have implications for the vaccination drive against the virus, especially for those who have so far stated a refusal to accept the jab.

This judgment “reinforces the possibility of a compulsory vaccination under conditions of the current COVID-19 epidemic,” Nicolas Hervieu, a legal expert specializing in the ECHR, told AFP news agency.

The ruling is literally about force-vaccinating children for the coronavirus, which cannot harm children, according to their own literature about the virus.

The decision said that the compulsory vaccines administered by Czech health authorities were in line with the “best interests” of children.

“The objective has to be that every child is protected against serious diseases, through vaccination or by virtue of herd immunity,” it added.

If that is the objective, then why won’t they offer exposure to the virus as an alternative to the vaccine?

I don’t actually believe the virus is something other than the flu, and there is no evidence it is something other than the flu, but regardless, the virus is a helluva lot less scary than the vaccine.

The court ruled that the Czech health policy was not in violation of Article 8 on the right to respect for private life in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights.

By Czech law, children must be vaccinated against nine diseases including diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B and measles.

The case was brought to the court by families who had been fined, or whose children had been refused access to a nursery for failing to comply with their legal vaccination duty.

Deutsche Welle goes on to inform us that the only reason that anyone would be concerned about this vaccine is because of purposeful disinformation, designed to appeal to stupid people, who need to be protected from their own stupidity.

Countries across Europe have seen a swell of disinformation regarding the coronavirus pandemic. This has led people to not only be skeptical about the coronavirus itself, but also about the COVID-19 vaccines.

Anti-vaxxers — people who refuse to receive vaccines, or to vaccinate their children — have spread various conspiracy theories about why governments want to vaccinate their populations.

As a result, governments may be contending with large segments of society who refuse to be vaccinated, making the goal of herd immunity that much more difficult.

Although the ruling by the ECHR may have set the precedent that obligatory vaccinations do not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights, this does not mean European countries will force people to be vaccinated.

It doesn’t mean that? Then what was the purpose of making a big show of the fact that it would be legal for them to do that?

The Czechs have been complaining about their kids getting banned from things because of these vaccine laws for years, so to pretend that it’s some kind of coincidence that the “Human Rights Court” decided to take up this case right now is ridiculous.

The entire EU system is run by Germany, which just started a push for yet another lockdown, even though we’re now going into summer.

Related: Spring is Here and America is Opening, But Angela Merkel is Calling for a New Extreme Lockdown

Democracy is Against Democratic Values

I am against universal suffrage democracy, because it is ridiculous. These people constantly admit that it is ridiculous by saying things like: “people on the internet are spreading misinformation about vaccines and people are so dumb they can’t understand what is right and wrong so we have to make their decisions for them.”

Obviously: I believe the opposite of that – that it is dumb people who are incapable of thinking for themselves that are agreeing to take the vaccine.

Regardless: both the German government and I agree that there is some large group of people who are incapable of making a good decision about a life changing medical procedure, because they are too easily influenced by forces outside of their own brain.

The difference is: I don’t believe that all of these dumb people have a universal right to decide how the government is run.

Of course: as we saw with the 2020 US presidential election fraud, as we see with the suppression of nationalist parties in Europe – the people promoting democracy don’t actually believe the masses of people should decide either. But that is what they are claiming they believe.

It is abject nonsense that illiterate peasants who cannot manage their own personal lives have some sort of divine ability to decide how a government is run, and the only reason you would promote the idea that they have that ability is that you want to subvert the government, engage in corruption and destroy freedom.


Even if you believed in the utopian fantasy of democracy, you would have to admit that basically every single one of its institutions and principles has already been subverted by the modern democracy system.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is one of the foundational documents of the modern order of democracy. It was adopted in 1948 by the United Nations. Like the Bill of Rights, it is a very simple document, listing off basic freedoms that cannot be infringed in the democracy system they are trying to build.

It’s a simple enough document that it fits into a JPEG file:

You can click that to enlarge it, zoom in and read it.

I don’t agree with many of the assertions made here. But some of it is just obvious – people must have certain freedoms, and the founders of globalist democracy agreed to this and set it down as legal doctrine.

Furthermore: you can see how someone would be pulled in by this romantic vision of the universal brotherhood of man. Especially people who had witnessed the horrors of communism and the Second World War.

I am not trying to pull a Ted Cruz here and do the “actually, I’m the thing my enemy falsely claims to be” bit. But there is no argument: if you compare the Daily Stormer’s doctrine to the doctrine of Kamala Harris and Angela Merkel, the Daily Stormer doctrine is the doctrine most similar to the principles outlined in the above document.

I don’t agree with the document’s internationalism, or its universal suffrage, but these current leaders are denying people of the most basic rights of conscience, belief, speech, privacy, equal justice and free movement.

You might also note that even if you believed the 2020 US presidential election was legitimate, you would have to concede that the fundamental principles of democracy were violated by the silencing of those who disagreed.

This document stresses that political belief is on par with race in terms of protections under equality acts.

Note the last article:

It doesn’t say “unless you’re white” or “unless there’s a virus.” It says that everyone on earth is guaranteed these rights.

This is what Russia means when they talk about “democracy.” They’re referring to this old fashioned concept, which is what they were promised by the West at the collapse of the Soviet Union.

For a long time, I’ve been meaning to sit down and go through all 30 articles, and point out where the modern rulers have violated these freedoms. I should actually do the double-whammy and give my own positions on each assertion alongside that of the current rulers.

We probably can’t pinpoint exactly where this whole thing converted from the idealism of the post-war period into this callous totalitarianism built on violence and lies. I’m sure there were some who had schemes going on at the time of the formation of the United Nations, while I think most probably genuinely believed in the idea of the universal brotherhood of man. But the modern system would be unrecognizable to the people of the post-war period who envisioned a united utopian world.

The bottom line is this: “Democracy” is not actually even the ruling ideology of this current period. That is a demonstrably false claim. These people ruling us are simply sadistic, tyrannical, and satanic.

It is now clear that this vaccine is indeed intended to be “The Mark of the Beast.”