October 13, 2016
What was that, m8?
If there’s one thing I can agree with the UN on, it’s that the media in Britain are racist and bigoted. I heard there’s still a few straight White males here and there, acting as news anchors or research assistants, smdh.
Luckily for us, the UN, ever helpful, has some suggestions to fix the problem.
As Britain starts extricating itself from the European Union, bureaucrats in Brussels continue to hand ammunition to Brexit supporters.
Last week, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) saw fit to advocate British journalists undergo some type of sensitivity training because—get this—they write too much about radical Islamist terrorism.
A sneak peak inside the ECRI.
I guess they don’t include grooming gangs in that assessment, because if there’s on thing the British media is good at covering-up to protect feelings, it’s Islamic grooming gangs.
The 83-page “ECRI Report on the United Kingdom” covers a wide range of alleged manifestations of intolerance in Britain. Those familiar with the deeply democratic, fair-minded, and civilized Brits will hardly recognize the country. Indeed, nowhere is it mentioned that Britain has never had fringe parties like those on the Continent, such as France’s National Front.
Yeah, I wish Brits were intolerant racists.
The British tabloid media is a particular target for the EU investigators. They blame an alleged increase in hate crimes and racism in the U.K. on the “worrying examples of intolerance and hate speech in the newspapers, online, and even among politicians.”
The fifth annual report deplores the British media for describing horrific acts of terrorism—such as those that have rocked France, Germany, and Belgium this year—as motivated by violent, militant Islam. The report says in part:
Where the media stress the Muslim background of perpetrators of terrorist acts, and devote significant coverage to it, the violent backlash against Muslims is likely to be greater than in cases where the perpetrators’ motivation is downplayed or rejected in favor of alternative explanations.
The ECRI strongly recommends that the authorities find a way to establish an independent press regulator according to the recommendations … It recommends more rigorous training for journalists to ensure better compliance with ethical standards.
(((Independent press regulator.)))
Can these skypes get anymore transparent?
They’re literally calling for a top-down 1984-style censorship apparatus to ensure the “free press” doesn’t color outside the lines. And this, just as the UK is getting ready to escape their claws with the implementation of Brexit.
But remember, Jews: the harder the push, the harder the push-back.