Electoral Chutzpah: Inside American Jewry’s Last Ditch Efforts to Steal Election

Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
November 27, 2016

2016 Electoral Map: Solid red except for a few blue pimples

The Yiddish word “chutzpah” has become street lingo across different linguistic groups that have been in contact with Jews. Interestingly, its use is unique in that it is used to emphasize degree rather than concept. Even though English has equivalent words – brazen, audacious, nerve – none of these can adequately describe the total lack of respect Jews have for the will of their host peoples.

Once again, American Jewry is begging for a confrontation with the white Gentile majority that elected Donald Trump as president. A new series of concocted schemes, following the template of Max Schulman’s Rally Round the Flag, Boys (Run it up the mast, and let’s see if anybody salutes“), have been featured throughout mainstream media – which at this point is nothing more than an nation-wide brainstorming session for how to block Trump from taking office.

Elite coastal Jewry has for years grown accustomed to simply muting, belittling, shutting-out and ignoring the white working people who founded, built and keep America running. If you’re a gifted white male from the heartland or an urban working class ethnic white (who isn’t a homosexual), you’re not going to ever get into any ivy league school. If you’re a Southerner, you’re only invited into the airless room for the sole purpose of Jews of hearing your accent and snickering. If you say “maybe all lives matter,” they’ll delete you from Facebook and hang the horns of “racist” on your head (if you let them).

People got fed up with being hated for no reason other than our race, and made a statement at the ballot box. But the wandering leech with the number 6 nose is not going to let those icky rednecks who can’t appreciate the brilliance of Hamilton have their day without a fight.

Let’s take a brief look at these various Jewish plots.

(((Jill Stein))) and (((Gabriel Sherman))): Bogus Hacking Claim

Jill Stein’s collection plate has been overflowing with cash as of late (unlike the Green Party’s presidential campaign), and she has succeeded in mounting a legal campaign to force a recount in at least one of the rust belt states (Wisconsin), promising more to come.

The premise from which she launched her campaign relies entirely on a fake news piece written by the Jew Gabriel Sherman, called “Experts Urge Clinton Campaign to Challenge Election Results in 3 Swing States,” published in the Zionist controlled New York Magazine. In it, Sherman cites University of Michigan computer security expert J. Alex Halderman, claiming that he has found “persuasive evidence” that machines in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania were “hacked” in favor of Trump:

Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump, New York has learned. The group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked. The group is so far not speaking on the record about their findings and is focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private.

The lawyer Bonifaz is a DNC operative looking to stir the pot, but Halderman himself is relatively credible.

The problem is, Sherman took what Halderman said completely out of context in order to cast suspicion over the legitimacy of the election.  Halderman in his interview with Sherman was musing about the potential for hacking to have occurred in these states, but admitted he had no evidence – that it was only speculation and probably didn’t happen.

He was forced to correct the record himself on Medium:

You may have read at NYMag that I’ve been in discussions with the Clinton campaign about whether it might wish to seek recounts in critical states. That article, which includes somebody else’s description of my views, incorrectly describes the reasons manually checking ballots is an essential security safeguard (and includes some incorrect numbers, to boot). Let me set the record straight about what I and other leading election security experts have actually been saying to the campaign and everyone else who’s willing to listen.

“Were this year’s deviations from pre-election polls the results of a cyberattack? Probably not. I believe the most likely explanation is that the polls were systematically wrong, rather than that the election was hacked. But I don’t believe that either one of these seemingly unlikely explanations is overwhelmingly more likely than the other. The only way to know whether a cyberattack changed the result is to closely examine the available physical evidence — paper ballots and voting equipment in critical states like Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, nobody is ever going to examine that evidence unless candidates in those states act now, in the next several days, to petition for recounts.”

So while Halderman is being facetious, experts like this have been arguing about this possibility for the last few elections and always call for recounts on paper ballots. What is different this time is that Jews don’t approve of the result, so suddenly a security director talking about the a remote chance of malfeasance turns into “experts believe they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania have been manipulated or hacked.”

Everyone involved knows that this is not the case, but the goal is incitement, not genuine concern about tampering unique to the 2016 election.

(((Daniel Brezenoff))) and (((Peter Beinert))): Jew Launches Petition to Ignore Electoral College and Elect Hillary on Grounds of Popular Vote

A number of social media celebrities have given traction to an online petition started by Daniel Brezenoff to get Electoral College voters to support the popular vote rather than the will of the states they are assigned to.


Americans, and his impulsivity, bullying, lying, admitted history of sexual assault, and utter lack of experience make him a danger to the Republic.

Secretary Clinton WON THE POPULAR VOTE and should be President.

Hillary won the popular vote. The only reason Trump “won” is because of the Electoral College.

But the Electoral College can actually give the White House to either candidate. So why not use this most undemocratic of our institutions to ensure a democratic result?


The petition is a textbook example of how the system has grown accustomed  in managing its “democracy”: only accept the results if it lines up with the ruling plutocracy’s desire. The label of “Populism” is openly deployed by our system as a pejorative, even though this is the Oxford Dictionary definition of it:

A member or adherent of a political party seeking to represent the interests of ordinary people.

The interests of ordinary people, represented by “racists” like Trump, are – using the system’s own discourse – a “threat to democracy.” That’s a tacit admission that a majority of the electorate is ready for racial nationalism, and that modern day oligarchic “democracy” is engineered to deceive the people by presenting dog-piss snow as a “Lemon Snow Cone.”


For all their shortcomings, the founding fathers designed the electoral college precisely to protect ordinary people in the United States from the tyranny of large groups of minorities and rich people concentrated in a few places (like the urban zones of California and New York City) being able to dictate policy unilaterally to people who far outnumber them and disagree but are spread out over the other 48 states.

If the electoral college were ignored or abolished, it would lead to full scale civil war. But Jew Brezenoff, along with the 4,637,521 signatories who outsource their political views to celebrities, foolishly believe it is still possible to ignore and write off the will of the white majority.

Another intensely anti-white Jew, Peter Beinart, has tried to articulate this petition with a superficially sound argument in a propaganda piece for the fake news site The Atlantic:

To modern American ears, it sounds insanely undemocratic for electors to ignore the will of the people of their state. But were Hamilton alive, he might wonder why Americans find this undemocratic feature of the Electoral College so outrageous while taking its other undemocratic features virtually for granted. For instance, each state gets as many electors as it has members of the House of Representatives and Senate. (The District of Columbia now gets a few, too). That is itself undemocratic. It’s undemocratic because while representatives are allocated between the states via population, senators are not. Each state gets two: Whether it has 38 million people (California) or half a million (Wyoming). Because states, not people, are represented equally in the Senate, the Senate is undemocratic. And because a state’s number of electors is based partly on its number of senators, the Electoral College is thus partially undemocratic too.

This is what Jews do. They push for their own tiny ethnic group’s interests by putting their demands in someone like Alexander Hamilton’s mouth (who’s dead and can’t defend himself) and hope you don’t notice what they’re doing.

(((Jeffrey K. Tulis))), (((Sanford Levinson))) and (((Jeremi Suri))): Get Electors to Vote Against Hillary, to Entice Enough GOP Electors to Vote Against Trump, to Then Elect Kasich in Cuck-Run House of Representatives


This plot gets an A for effort, as it’s a devious take on corner-cutting.

The three Jewish university “experts” Tulis, Levinson and Suri (yes, even the one with the Indian name is  a Jew) appear to be wearing their “Principled Conservative” costume for this one. In Mort Zuckerman’s Daily News, they put out a blueprint intended for both Democrats and Republicans to work together to get a Neo-Con – any Neo-Con – elected:

Instead of asking Republican electors to vote for Hillary Clinton, we suggest that Democrats organize electors from a state Clinton won to vote for someone else, in order to persuade Republican electors in other states to do the same. Democrats must show that they are not trying to push Clinton into the presidency (despite her victory in the popular vote), but acting to find a qualified alternative to Trump. That is the only goal that can unite Democrats and Republicans.

California, with its bounty of 55 electoral votes, currently pledged to Clinton, could take the lead. The Democratic leadership of the state should reach out to moderate Republicans in other states, and contemplate potential Republican alternatives to Trump — perhaps John Kasich or Mitt Romney or Mike Pence (although he is closely tied to Trump’s hateful campaign and early administration selections). If only 37 electors from states Trump won join this bi-partisan effort, the election will be thrown into the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority can then make a final choice.

His early administration selections are figures rejected by the mainstream Republican Party for their extreme positions on these issues, their unethical behavior and their sheer incompetence. Trump is creating a team of untethered haters in the White House who will plunge our nation into a disaster that no one outside of his immediate circle wants.

Many of the Republican electors recognize this, and they would prefer a different President for the good of their party and the country. Most of the electors should know that voting for Trump will not protect them from his personal attacks on what they care most about. He has proven himself, in the campaign and since Nov. 8, willing to hurt any individuals who challenge him. Giving him more power as President will imperil his supporters as much as his opponents. Republican electors have a strong self-interest in finding someone else.

This plan is so crazy, it might just work. Six Hillary Clinton Electors have already declared themselves “faithless electors,” who will thus vote against Hillary if they can successfully lobby GOP electors to vote against Trump.

They are probably being bribed and oriented by bigger powers, but the media is already trying to make this potential conspiracy palatable by gaming the public with claims that Trump is “already flip-flopping” on campaign promises.

So far, if you read fake reports put out by Jewish disinfo services like Reuters, working class white people are supposed to be upset that Trump is going to keep the provision in Obamacare that lets you keep children in the poorest generation in decades on your health insurance until age 26, while preventing private insurance from blocking coverage for people who are sick and need help. What normal person would get angry at this? Jews in the press apparently think it’s going to work.

In the end, I would say to Chutzpathic Jews: “Do it!”

Jews trying to steal Trump’s election after his millions of ardent, armed and angry supporters have been told he won for weeks would be like the Yippee Ki-yay scene at the end of Die Hard. The fuse will be lit.

Seeing as not one person pushing for this travesty and fraud is a non-Jew, Jews may very well be pogrommed in the street in such an occasion. The greatest threat to democracy is not terrorists who want Sharia law, it’s wormy Yids monopolizing our think-tanks, academia and media loudspeakers – it’s time President-Elect Trump to start treating them as what they are.