DOJ Jew Investigates Jewish Conspiracy in DOJ – Finds There’s Nothing to It

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 15, 2018

James “Aw gee, shucks” O’Comey

So the DOJ Jew investigating the Jewish conspiracy at the DOJ finally released his report.

There’s really nothing to it, guys.

Comey’s real error was not letting Hillary Clinton off completely for all of the crimes she committed – it was announcing that he was reopening the investigation just a week before the election, which maybe helped Trump in the election.

So, it’s really that everything is the exact opposite of what everyone thought – Hillary Clinton was the real victim in all of this.

Golly, what a relief.


Former FBI Director James Comey made a “serious error of judgment” when he announced shortly before the 2016 U.S. presidential election that he was reopening an investigation into candidate Hillary Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server, the Justice Department’s internal watchdog said on Thursday.

But Inspector General Michael Horowitz also concluded in a long-awaited, 500-page report that Comey did not exhibit political bias or try to influence the election; nor did he contest the decision not to charge Clinton with a crime.

And while embarrassing for the FBI, the report appeared to lack the kind of bombshell revelation that would significantly boost an effort by Trump and his allies to paint the FBI as corrupt and discredit the Russia investigation.


Nothing to see here at all, goyim.

FBI Director Christopher Wray told reporters at a briefing that he accepted the inspector general’s report, but stressed it did not find that political bias had impacted its investigations.

“The report does identify errors of judgment, violations of, or even disregard for policy and decisions that at the very least, with the benefit of hindsight, were not the best choices,” Wray said. “We need to hold ourselves accountable.”

The inspector general’s inquiry focused on public statements made by Comey about Democrat Clinton’s use of a private email server, instead of a State Department server, while she was secretary of state.

In October 2016, less than two weeks before Election Day, Comey sent members of Congress a letter disclosing that a probe into Clinton’s emails was being reopened after new emails were discovered, a disclosure Clinton contends contributed to her surprise defeat by Trump. Two days before the Nov. 8 election, Comey said the FBI found no additional evidence in the new emails.

John Podesta, who ran the Clinton campaign, told Reuters “the report demonstrates beyond doubt” that Comey was unfair to Clinton by announcing developments concerning the email probe in the heat of the campaign while not revealing the existence of the Russia probe, launched in late July 2016.

Wow, Podesta. The pizzaman himself.

Haven’t heard from him in a while.

Comey defended his actions in an op-ed published in the New York Times after the report was released.

“In 2016, my team faced an extraordinary situation — something I thought of as a 500-year flood — offering no good choices and presenting some of the hardest decisions I ever had to make,” Comey wrote.


The report sharply criticized Comey for violating Justice Department policies and accused him of usurping the authority of then Attorney General Loretta Lynch when he held a news conference in July 2016 and announced there was insufficient evidence to charge Clinton with a federal crime over her use of a private server.

Comey said Lynch forced his hand when she did not recuse herself from the Clinton probe, even after a June 2016 meeting with former President Bill Clinton aboard her plane raised concerns she was conflicted.

Thursday’s report found that while Lynch did not discuss the email investigation with Bill Clinton, she failed “to recognize the appearance problem” created by the meeting and did not try to cut the meeting short.

This report PROVES once and for all that they were just discussing their grandchildren on that secret tarmac conspiracy meeting.

What a relief.

Lynch in a statement called the report “thorough and in depth” and said it “upholds my fidelity to the rule of law” and “affirms that my actions had no political motivation or bias.”

Trump and his allies have accused a clique of FBI and Justice Department officials of working against Trump.

The Horowitz report was highly critical of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, two FBI staff members who exchanged highly charged political messages, finding their texts cast a cloud over the FBI and created the appearance of bias.

In one newly released email from August 2016, Page wrote to Strzok asking “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right!”

Strzok replied: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

Yeah but here’s the kicker – even though they were planning to stop the election of Trump, they had no bias. 

It was a totally unbiased high-level law enforcement conspiracy to sway a presidential election.

The report criticized the FBI for a one-month delay between the time new Clinton emails were found on Sept. 26, 2016 and when the FBI finally got a search warrant to review them to search for new evidence in late October as the election loomed.

I’m sure it also found that there was also no crime when Clinton destroyed all that evidence. Probably didn’t even need to bother mentioning it.

Strzok was among a number of FBI employees who failed to act promptly, the report said.

“The FBI’s inaction had potentially far-reaching consequences,” the report says, noting there were no persuasive arguments to explain the delay.

The report added that the inspector general’s office was very concerned about a decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Clinton probe in light of the new emails.

Strzok’s lawyer Aitan Goelman said the report, while flawed in some conclusions, found no evidence that his political views had an impact on the Clinton probe.

So there it is.

I was really worried, but now all my fears have been massaged.

Seems like it was all just a big misunderstanding.

Thanks for that, Mr. Horowitz.

We needed someone we can trust – god’s chosen one – to do an investigation this brutally honest.

Um, But Srsly Tho

This is like having the fox investigate a murder in the hen house.

This is absolutely retarded.

I said this was going to be the dumbest thing you ever saw – but I didn’t even think this Jew would have the nerve to come out and say that the real crime was Comey reopening the investigation right before the election (when he found those emails on Huma’s computer, which her Jewish husband was using for sex chats with underage girls).

Trump never should have allowed the DOJ to investigate themselves first.

This biases whatever investigation comes next.

Or maybe it doesn’t. Maybe this report is so goofy that it will serve as justification for an independent investigation of the DOJ and FBI.