December 12, 2019
She’s wearing makeup.
It is somewhat sad to see this creature being used as some kind of inside joke by the UN overlords.
She gave yet another speech preaching to the choir, doing her usual “I want you to panic” bit and explaining that people have to stop not being united behind the science in order to prevent some kind of Climate Apocalypse.
To reach the microphone, she had to use a step.
This is a new low for Greta Thunberg.
What a comically tiny critter.
Activist Greta Thunberg today accused political and business leaders of polishing their images rather than taking aggressive action in the fight against climate change at the UN climate talks.
In a speech given at the COP25 talks in Madrid, Spain, the teenager also criticised governments for avoiding taking action to cut greenhouse gas emissions and ‘not behaving as if we are in an emergency’.
Greta, who inspired the school strikes for the climate movement, said: ‘The biggest danger is not inaction; the real danger is when politicians and CEOs are making it look like real action is happening, when in fact almost nothing is being done apart from clever accounting and creative PR.’
She said the science showed that, at the current rate of emissions, the world is set to use up the whole ‘carbon budget’ – the amount of pollution that can be put into the atmosphere and still keep global warming to 1.5C – in eight years.
Countries previously committed to curbing global warming at ‘well below’ 2C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to keep temperature rises to 1.5C in the Paris Agreement secured in 2015.
Global problems require global solutions, and global solutions just so happen to require global governments.
That “carbon budget” thing is highly likely to be yet another failed global warming and climate change prediction.
None of the things that the climate people have been saying will happen have happened.
Governments meeting at the talks are now under pressure to take more ambitious action to cut greenhouse gases, which continue to rise, to avoid the worst effects of climate change.
Greta, 16, warned that ‘even at 1C people are dying from the climate crisis‘ and the science showed that going beyond 1.5C risks destabilising the climate and hitting irreversible tipping points such as melting glaciers and permafrost.
What are the “worst effects” of it? According to CNN, it’s mostly the primitive-skinned who are affected, which is actually a pretty great effect considering that they’re overpopulating everything.
She said: ‘Finding holistic solutions is what the COP should be all about, but instead it seems to have turned some kind of opportunity for countries to negotiate loopholes and to avoid raising their ambition.
‘Countries are finding clever ways around having to take real action, like double-counting emissions reductions, and moving emissions overseas, and walking back on their promises to increase ambitions, or refusing to pay for solutions or loss and damage. This has to stop.’
There it is. Of course it is white people who have to pay for solutions, pay for Climate Reparations, and pretty much do all the work.
It is our duty as Climate Sinners to atone for our weather mistakes.
‘Zero by 2050 means nothing if high emissions continue for even a few years. Then the remaining budget will be gone.’
She said real, drastic emissions cuts were needed, and carbon had to stay in the ground to keep temperature rises below 1.5C.
Greta and the rest of the climate change warriors talk as if it was proven that these things that the weather does are a consequence of the actions of men.
Any natural disaster, storm, earthquake, volcano eruption, variance in temperature, and pretty much anything happening in nature nowadays can and will be attributed to “climate change” despite the fact that these things were happening way before carbon emissions were a thing.
If they want to pin all of those things to man-made climate change, they should provide a very good explanation for why literally the same things had a different cause in the past.
It was actually shocking that they didn’t blame the recent volcano eruption in New Zealand on “climate change.” They easily could have done so. None of this is scientific at all, so they could have just said something like “it seems that heating up the atmosphere is also having a knock-on effect, and heating up the magma inside of the earth.” No one would have blinked, other than people who were already blinking.