Firstly, black people don’t care about Civil War base names, and they don’t even know who these people are.
If you explained it to them, they would just say, “dayyyyyyyyuummmmm,” and then return to their usual shuffling.
Also, in actual reality, the reason that bases are named after Confederate Generals is that it is considered honorable and noble to name things after a vanquished enemy that fought nobly. It’s the same reason we name military helicopters after American Indian tribes.
That is to say, it’s actually the opposite of the thing that they’re saying it is.
Confederate Army symbols within the military, including prominent Army bases named for rebel generals, are divisive and can be offensive to Black people in uniform, the nation’s top officer said Thursday.
“The American Civil War was fought and it was an act of rebellion, it was an act of treason at the time, against the Union, against the Stars and Stripes, against the U.S. Constitution, and those officers turned their backs on their oaths,” Army Gen. Mark Milley told a House Armed Services Committee hearing.
Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, noted that some see it differently. “Some think it’s heritage. Others think it’s hate.”
He said he has recommended creating a commission to study the matter. The House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act for the budget year starting Oct. 1 include provisions for changing the names of 10 Army bases named for Confederate generals. President Donald Trump says he would veto the defense bill if the version that reaches his desk includes a requirement to change the names.
“These Monumental and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, and a. history of Winning, Victory, and Freedom,” Trump wrote on Twitter last month. “The United States of America trained and deployed our HEROES on these Hallowed Grounds, and won two World Wars. Therefore, my Administration will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations.”
Milley did not explicitly say the base names should be changed, but he noted that the Army is now about 20% Black.
The reason people are pretending things like this matter is that they want to harm white people. Period. The Jews can get blacks worked up about anything, just by hitting emotional triggers. They could just as easily have them up in arms about Jews stealing their history by pretending to be the true Israelites.
They could much more easily get them worked up about something that actually affects their personal lives, like their housing situation and the behavior of Jew slumlords.
Mark Milley is the same general who apologized for standing with Trump when he walked to the church last month after Washington, DC had been burned to the ground.
Shockingly – and this is really going to knock your socks off – he is totally and completely unmarried and childless at the age of 62, with no record of ever having been engaged or even having dated, ever.
The US military is a homosexual cult.
The Democrats used to hate and fear the US military and regularly protest it. You’ll notice that they never do that now, and in fact, they’re fanatical about war. That is because the military was taken over by Democrat operatives. The easiest way to do that was to use homosexuals to promote their own within the ranks.
If you go through the top leadership of the military, you will be hard pressed to find a single man who has ever been married. People who analyze this situation will say, “oh, this is something of a normal situation in history, many military men weren’t married…”
Firstly, even though that is a thing, it wasn’t ALL military men that weren’t married – this is something we’ve never seen before. Just look through American history.
Secondly, prostitution used to be a huge thing with the military – both at home and abroad, places where there was a military base would always have huge areas of prostitution. That obviously isn’t true anymore.
So who are all of these manly military men having sex with??? This is a biological function, is it not? And there is no reason they can’t be married, is there? Surely, it puts a stress on marriage to have a husband who works and moves around a lot, but this is the case for many different careers.
What’s more, there are how many officers that are married? We all know people who when you ask them where they’re from they say, “well, nowhere really, I was a military brat and my family moved around…” – but you will find no such stories in the high ranks of the military. It is all conspicuously unmarried men.
The Democrats were obviously afraid that in a situation of civil unrest, the military would side with the Republicans. So they infiltrated the military and replaced it with a bunch of cocksuckers, who they can trust to do their bidding.