July 12, 2019
Almost all Jewish discourse can be construed as an attempt to avoid one haunting and essential truth: that the prejudice they have inspired throughout history is justified and is caused by their own behavior.
To this end, a fantastical conspiracy theory has been constructed, according to which anti-Jewish feeling has been inspired by cultural artefacts (“tropes”), which have somehow been exchanged by all the world’s peoples, speaking their various languages, living widely separated from one another, indeed scarcely often even aware of one another’s existence, and yet somehow able to mutually communicate these “misimpressions” of Jews and maintain them intact for thousands of years.
Only by cultivating an intense “Us vs. Them” mindset could such a maniacal distortion of reality be made to seem plausible.
Now and then, when a new financial scandal breaks, when another Holocaust hoaxer is exposed, when a particularly egregious example of Jewish hypocrisy comes to light, doubt will inevitably arise in the mind of the average Jew: could the goy possibly be right after all?
On these occasions, it is the role of Jewish thought leaders to step forth and deliver pep talks, reassuring their fellow Jews. “No, the goy aren’t right. They hate us for no reason. Disregard anything the goy think, feel or say. Have faith in your own Chosenness, my friends.”
Here we have one such screed on the occasion of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
When I heard that Jeffrey Epstein had been arrested on sex-trafficking charges, I cringed. I’m sure I was not the only Jewish person who did, or whose first thought was, Why does this sorry excuse for a human have to be Jewish? And I probably also wasn’t the only Jewish person whose second thought was, Given that he is Jewish, why does he have to have such a Jewish-sounding name?
It’s a natural response to a people who have been hounded by anti-Semites, to cringe when one of our own behaves in such a horrifying manner. And of course, it didn’t take long for the anti-Semites to crawl out of their holes with the reactions that prompted mine.
Did Jeffrey Epstein abuse any Jewish girls?
— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) July 8, 2019
It may be natural to fear the wrongdoing of our own not just for its moral ugliness but for the attacks against the rest of us that such wrongdoing will surely engender. But it’s also a fallacy.
As Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt once told me when I interviewed her about her book, Antisemitism: Here and Now, it doesn’t matter how Jews behave. Anti-Semitism is not based on anything rational. Rooted in a mythology of secret Jewish power, money, control, and dual loyalties, anti-Semitism and Jewish wrongdoing have little to do with each other.
We all cringe as Jews when one of our own, with such a Jewish-sounding name, turns out to be a horrible person (and it doesn’t get much more horrible than being a child rapist). But cringing over Jewish deplorables is at the end of the day something of a category error. It’s the wrongdoing, not the Jewishness, that should horrify us.
After all, anti-Semitism is a virus that does not depend on the behavior of actual Jews. They would hate us, anyway. Lipstadt compares anti-Semitism to herpes — “It’s disgusting, but it doesn’t go away. Come a moment of stress in society, come a moment of tension into someone’s life, it can pop up,” she said. Anti-Semitism is the herpes in society. “It keeps asserting itself at times of tension, at times of dislocation, and that’s one of the reasons we’re seeing it.”
They hate us when a Jew is successful in the public eye, and they hate us when a Jew is a villain in the public eye. It makes no difference.
This is why if Israel went away, or if Zionism had never existed to begin with, so-called “left-wing anti-Semitism” would still be around; it would simply have taken another form. Anti-Zionism is the excuse, the drawing-room and academic-conference respectability the anti-Semitism virus feeds upon. But it can always find something else.
It’s natural to feel shame when one of our own turns out to be a villain, just as it’s natural to feel pride when one of our own is successful in politics, sports or entertainment. The thing is, that shame is playing by the anti-Semites’ rules. It’s assuming a collective responsibility for one man’s actions.
We can reverse engineer a Jewish success story to make it about their Jewish upbringing, but then we have to accept the other side of the coin: Is it his Jewishness that makes Epstein a horrible person? The anti-Semites will say yes (and they already have), but we don’t need to fall into the trap of claiming “Not all Jews.”
Many Jews are especially angry at their fellow Jews who are in the public eye for misdeeds. They are angry because they’re Jews, and so should have had a better understanding of what it means to act unethically. While understandable, it’s still playing by the anti-Semites’ rules.
Instead, condemn the man for his misdeeds, but leave the Jews out of it. Epstein isn’t going to contribute to anti-Semitism. If it wasn’t Epstein, it would be somebody else.
Cringe Over Epstein – but cringe over him as a fellow human, not as a Jew.