Black Woman Sues Harvard for Profiting from Photos of Black Slaves

Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
March 22, 2019

Photo-like thing of a nigger that another nigger claims to be related to.

There’s a nigger so angry about Harvard Jews still enslaving one of her nigger ancestors in current year that she’s suing them for it.


Harvard University has “shamelessly” turned a profit from photos of two 19th-century slaves while ignoring requests to turn the photos over to the slaves’ descendants, according to a lawsuit filed Wednesday.

Tamara Lanier, of Norwich, Connecticut, is suing the Ivy League school for “wrongful seizure, possession and expropriation” of images she says depict two of her ancestors. Her suit, filed in Massachusetts state court, demands that Harvard immediately turn over the photos, acknowledge her ancestry and pay an unspecified sum in damages.

Tamara Lanier

At the center of the case is a series of 1850 daguerreotypes, an early type of photo, taken of two South Carolina slaves identified as Renty and his daughter, Delia. Both were posed shirtless and photographed from several angles. The images are believed to be the earliest known photos of American slaves.

They were commissioned by Harvard biologist Louis Agassiz, whose theories on racial difference were used to support slavery in the U.S. The lawsuit says Agassiz came across Renty and Delia while touring plantations in search of racially “pure” slaves born in Africa.

To Agassiz, Renty and Delia were nothing more than research specimens,” the suit says. “The violence of compelling them to participate in a degrading exercise designed to prove their own subhuman status would not have occurred to him, let alone mattered.”

That sounds like something redacted by a Jew, so this is like lawyer Jews against Harvard Jews, which means it’s likely to actually be an inside-joke for the Jews or something.

Really, this wide-spreading of Jewish language gymnastics is getting out of control. They call pretty much everything “violence” these days.

The suit attacks Harvard for its “exploitation” of Renty’s image at a 2017 conference and in other uses. It says Harvard has capitalized on the photos by demanding a “hefty” licensing fee to reproduce the images. It also draws attention to a book Harvard sells for $40 with Renty’s portrait on the cover. The book, called “From Site to Sight: Anthropology, Photography, and the Power of Imagery,” explores the use of photography in anthropology.

Among other demands, the suit asks Harvard to acknowledge that it bears responsibility for the humiliation of Renty and Delia and that Harvard “was complicit in perpetuating and justifying the institution of slavery.”

A researcher at a Harvard museum rediscovered the photos in storage in 1976. But Lanier’s case argues Agassiz never legally owned the photos because he didn’t have his subjects’ consent and that he didn’t have the right to pass them to Harvard. Instead, the suit says, Lanier is the rightful owner as Renty’s next of kin.

The immediate thing to ask here would be “how can she prove that Agassiz didn’t have Renty’s consent?” but independently of the slave niggers consenting or not, was there any law back then that explicitly stated that you needed someone’s consent to photograph them and that photographs of people photographed without consent belonged to the photographed people?

This is an attempt at applying current laws and values to events that happened in the past in order to “set things right” for present-day blacks.

This could set a dangerous precedent.

What this Lanier nigger is arguing is that someone profited from slavery in the past and that current day people vaguely related to that someone are profiting from those things once produced by slavery. She’s asking  for an “unspecified sum in damages.”

If she wins, more niggers are likely to start asking for “reparations” using this case as a reference.

Could that be the inside joke between Harvard Jews and lawyer Jews?

The suit also argues that Harvard’s continued possession of the images violates the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery.

Renty is 169 years a slave by our calculation,” civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump, one of Lanier’s lawyers, said in an interview. “How long will it be before Harvard finally frees Renty?

What level of Jewish rhetoric is that?

Lanier says she grew up hearing stories about Renty passed down from her mother. While enslaved in Columbia, South Carolina, Renty taught himself to read and later held secret Bible readings on the plantation, the suit says. He is described as “small in stature but towering in the minds of those who knew him.”

The suit says Lanier has verified her genealogical ties to Renty, whom she calls “Papa Renty.” She says he is her great-great-great-grandfather.

If given the photos, Lanier said she would tell “the true story of who Renty was.” But she also hopes her case will spark a national discussion over race and history.

She’s saying that this E.T. looking nigger taught himself to read?

Maybe she’s telling the truth. E.T. was pretty smart.