Are Jews Turning Against the SPLC?

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
April 29, 2018

Yeah guys, the SPLC is a smear machine – unlike the ADL, which is factual and fair at all times, of course.

The two most pre-eminent Jewish organizations dedicated to the destruction and humiliation of the goyim in America are the ADL and the SPLC.

The ADL, of course, was founded at the beginning of the 20th century in order to sue gentiles who criticized Jews – even if the Jews were criticized for doing horrible crimes, like Leo Frank.

The SPLC, on the other hand, was never explicitly a Jewish organization. It was founder by Morris Dees, a gentile, and the Jew Joseph Levin. Its stated purpose is to attack “hate” groups and promote “civil rights,” which is to say, the dispossession of White people.

Both of these organizations eventually morphed into general attack platforms for going after anyone and anything the Jews don’t like, either through legal means, subterfuge or even criminal activity.

They’re like the Jewish police and Jewish Mafia rolled into one.

So, seeing this hit piece against the SPLC in a mainstream Jewish magazine is quite a shock.


Shortly after the election of Donald Trump in November of 2016, a lot of people I knew wrote biggish checks to the Southern Poverty Law Center. They weren’t alone: According to tax filings, the group took in $136 million last year alone, bringing its total assets to a whopping half-a-billion dollars.

This surge in the organization’s popularity makes sense: The SPLC, after all, is the group that had once, nearly four decades ago, protected Vietnamese shrimpers from the Klan in Galveston Bay, sued several white supremacist groups out of existence, and delivered justice to the family Mulugeta Seraw, an Ethiopian student bludgeoned to death by members of a Neo-Nazi group in Portland, Oregon. You’d think that an organization with such a gleaming record would be richly deserving of support, particularly as far-right thugs are once again openly on the march.

Then again, you could ask Sam Harris.

In late March, the SPLC included a piece about the best-selling author in its daily Hatewatch Headlines, a compilation of media reports on bigots, thugs, and other assorted creeps.

Oops. Sam Harris is a Jew. I guess that’s where the SPLC goofed. Their mission is to serve the Jews, not attack them.

This might be our clue as to the Jews’ change of heart. The SPLC’s Hate Watch targets Sam Harris tier gentiles constantly. They had a piece about Jordan Peterson just last month, for example.

But Tablet is mainly concerned about their Jew being attacked.

Why was the neuroscientist and prominent atheist thrown in together with Mark Anthony Conditt, the Austin bomber who had murdered two black men, and Nazi war criminal Jakiw Palij? Because Harris defended Charles Murray, a political scientist best-known for arguing that genetic differences may account for varying levels of intelligence between races. The assertion drove many in academia and journalism to label Murray a racist; he was famously shouted out of an appearance at Middlebury College last March, and was labeled a “White Nationalist” and an “extremist” by the SPLC. But when the prominent Harvard geneticist David Reich echoed Murray’s ideas in a New York Times op-ed last month—arguing that “it is simply no longer possible to ignore average genetic differences among ‘races’”—Harris took several of Murray’s critics to task on Twitter, including Vox’s Ezra Klein. Klein responded in his typically obfuscating fashion, doing little to discuss the ideas at hand and a lot to strangle them with potent ideological terms. White men discussing the possibility of genetic differences between blacks and whites wasn’t science, Klein thundered—it was racism pure and simple, facts and findings be damned. The SPLC was quick to mirror this sentiment, placing Harris on its HateWatch list.

Okay, so Sam Harris is one data point. What other examples of SPLC “wrongdoing” are Tablet concerned with?

This was far from the first time that the SPLC applied the blunt force of its historic reputation to label political opponents as racists or extremists. Harris’s co-author, Majid Nawaaz, experienced the organization’s wrath as well. A former radical Islamist who spent four years in an Egyptian prison, Nawaaz abandoned his zealotry and committed his life to promoting a pluralistic and non-violent version of Islam, a mission that led him to serve as an advisor to three British Prime Ministers.

Wew, I can see why the Jews would love this guy. He definitely makes Moslems seem normal, for White people.

What the hell is “non-violent” Islam? How do you commit terrorism without violence? I’m confused.

In the fall of 2016, however, Nawaaz was placed on the SPLC’s list of “anti-Muslim extremists,” widely disseminated with the header “a journalist’s manual.” His sins, according to the list, included sharing a cartoon of Jesus and Muhammad on Twitter and visiting a London strip club. You hardly have to be a scholar to realize that neither is particularly convincing evidence that Nawaaz, himself a practicing Muslim, is some sort of bigot. Joining him on the list was Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a victim of female genital mutilation in her native Somalia and an outspoken campaigner against the practice, as well as others, like child marriage and honor killings, common throughout the Islamic world.

Another magic negro.

Ok, so I think I have a pretty good idea of what’s going on with Tablet mag’s criticisms here.

Basically, the SPLC has gone off the reservation. They forgot their mission and just started randomly enforcing SJW ethics on society, with no thought of how it affected the Jews and their agenda.

In other words, the SPLC’s current behavior pattern is no longer good for the Jews

Presumably, the Jews expect that the SPLC will get this message and correct course. I’m not sure this is possible anymore, though. These organizations all had to hire brown people and SJW millenials, who are “true believers” in these stupid ideas.  So I’m not at all certain that this kind of human material could be disciplined to serve the Jews efficiently.

There’s a good chance that this conflict could end with the SPLC losing a lot of its funding and media support. Good.