007 Actor Daniel Craig Says He Won’t Leave His Fortune to His Children

Pomidor Quixote and Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 22, 2020

Imagine not wanting to help your offspring.

I guess this is what he has to do to make up for being white and James Bond in current year, when James Bond should by rights be an African tranny with Down syndrome.

Daily Mail:

Daniel Craig has insisted he won’t be giving a penny of his £125million fortune to his children because he believes ‘inheritance is distasteful.’

The James Bond actor, 52, revealed his ‘philosophy is to get rid of it or give it away before you go’ and says he has no plans on passing down his wealth to his daughters, including the two-year-old he shares with wife Rachel Weisz, 50.

In a new interview, the 007 star, said: ‘I don’t want to leave great sums to the next generation‘ – after earning a reported £18million for his final James Bond film, No Time to Die.

Speaking to Saga magazine, he continued: ‘I think inheritance is quite distasteful. My philosophy is to get rid of it or give it away before you go.’

Daniel is a father to daughter Ella, 28, who he shares with ex-wife Fiona Loudon, 51, and a child whose name hasn’t been confirmed with current partner Rachel.

This is the standard policy of Western governments.

Everything that our ancestors built is being thrown away or given to foreigners.

It’s not the first time I hear people saying more or less what Daniel Craig said. Apparently, due to Equality, Equity, or whatever, people are supposed to start from the same spot to make life fair or something.

It’s retarded.

Nothing long-lasting can be built if every generation lives as if there were no future generations.

Craig’s final Bond film is coming out in November. I suspect it will be pretty good, in technical terms, as they are apparently handing over the mantle of the franchise to a black woman.

Or maybe they’re not doing that? They keep going back and forth.

Join the discussion at TGKBBS